Skip to content

elevate-project routes updated#356

Merged
priyanka-TL merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
chore/utils-routes-update-3
Oct 9, 2025
Merged

elevate-project routes updated#356
priyanka-TL merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
chore/utils-routes-update-3

Conversation

@Prajwal17Tunerlabs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Prajwal17Tunerlabs Prajwal17Tunerlabs commented Oct 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new POST API endpoint at /project/v1/userExtension/update to enable updating user extension details within the Project service. This adds broader API coverage without impacting existing routes or behavior. No breaking changes.
  • Chores

    • Bumped package version to 1.1.50 to reflect the new endpoint availability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds a new POST route mapping for /project/v1/userExtension/update in elevate-project/constants/routes.js and bumps package version from 1.1.49 to 1.1.50.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Routing: Add userExtension update route
elevate-project/constants/routes.js
Appends a new route object for POST /project/v1/userExtension/update with inSequence: false, orchestrated: false, targeting the same path/method under service "project".
Version bump
elevate-project/package.json
Increments version from 1.1.49 to 1.1.50.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant C as Client
  participant G as API Gateway/Router
  participant P as Project Service

  C->>G: POST /project/v1/userExtension/update (body)
  Note right of G: Route config: inSequence=false, orchestrated=false
  G->>P: Forward POST /project/v1/userExtension/update
  P-->>G: Response (status, payload)
  G-->>C: Response propagated
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • VISHNUDAS-tunerlabs

Poem

A rabbit taps the router’s slate—
New path burrows, swift and straight.
POST hops in without a queue,
No orchestration—clean and true.
Version ticks with gentle cheer,
Another trail is crystal clear. 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly indicates that the elevate-project’s routing configuration has been modified, directly reflecting the core change of adding a new route entry in the routes array.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/utils-routes-update-3

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70de43f and b902046.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • elevate-project/constants/routes.js (1 hunks)
  • elevate-project/package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
elevate-project/package.json (1)

3-3: LGTM!

The version bump from 1.1.49 to 1.1.50 is appropriate for adding a new route configuration.

elevate-project/constants/routes.js (1)

3274-3284: Confirm ID-parameterized variant for /project/v1/userExtension/update.
Most update routes include both non-parameterized and :id variants; please confirm whether /project/v1/userExtension/update/:id should be added.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@priyanka-TL priyanka-TL merged commit 63f7439 into master Oct 9, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants