doc/BACKUP.md: Discourage litestream use.#4916
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vincenzopalazzo
suggested changes
Nov 18, 2021
Collaborator
vincenzopalazzo
left a comment
vincenzopalazzo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Concept ack f84ae1d
ChangeLog-None
ZmnSCPxj
force-pushed
the
no-litestream
branch
from
f84ae1d to
8f60da1
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebased on master. |
Collaborator
|
ACK 8f60da1
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ChangeLog-None
#4857 suggests that even if we indicate a 60-second timer,
litestreammight still lead to crashes. Given #4890 is already merged in, we should encourage use of that instead.