-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Add some more validation checks for process flows #323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
03b59f2
Rename: flow_raw => flow
alexdewar f9d7280
Check process flows are valid numbers
alexdewar c9e4ca7
Disallow commodity flexible assets for now
alexdewar 4d86d2d
Check flow cost is valid
alexdewar 4b7e1ec
Ensure every process has associated flows
alexdewar 2244093
Ensure every process has at least one PAC
alexdewar 0654e21
Add separate check whether flow is zero
alexdewar c2f31bf
Fix: `availabilities` will not be empty here
alexdewar ec65c44
Refactor `read_processes` to consume `descriptions`
alexdewar cc53fda
Refactor creation of `Process`es into separate function
alexdewar 4622e14
Add tests for `create_process_map`
alexdewar 518bb12
Move check for missing params to create_process_map
alexdewar d4fca15
Move check for missing availabilities to create_process_map
alexdewar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add tests for these two cases?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, probably. I was being a bit lazy here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In order to write tests, I split out the map creation stuff into its own function. I also figured that this function is the right place to check for other missing process data (e.g. flows, availabilities). I had been checking for this by just checking that the data structures had the same length as the
process_idsone, but by doing the check when we actually need the data for a given process, we can tell the user which process is missing this data, so I think that's an improvement.