This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 8, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
[ufc] fix string conversion #51
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ | ||
| from typing import Dict, List, Union | ||
|
|
||
| ValueType = Union[str, int, float, bool] | ||
| AttributeType = Union[str, int, float, bool] | ||
| AttributeType = Union[str, int, float, bool, None] | ||
| ConditionValueType = Union[AttributeType, List[AttributeType]] | ||
| SubjectAttributes = Dict[str, AttributeType] | ||
| Action = str |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle an array of strings?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
null?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could normalize boolean,

Noneand arrays by converting to JSON. Just about every language has some library that can convert to JSON, so this would work for every SDK:So the logic might be:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AttributeType = Union[str, int, float, bool]Attribute cannot be an array -- but good call that we do want to handle null.
Using
jsonis a great suggestion, but I do want to make sure we aren't losing a lot of performance (I've seenjsonbeing very slow, but perhaps here it's sufficiently quickly given that the input is small)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's a valid concern. It still might be useful as an "else" case for any value that we don't expect (sort of a cross-language toString()), while handling the cases that we expect in a more performant way, but I'm good with whatever you decide so long as we handle
None/nullThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like using json is equally fast
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it looks like they're equal because they both landed on
if isinstance(value, str):. You should try it out with no conditionals -- just running the functions we want tested: (strvsjson.dumps)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But in any case, the
json.dumpsonly happens after all other conditionals fail, so we're still good here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh good catch 😓