feat(ce-proof): broaden triggers and surface markdown viewing#618
Merged
feat(ce-proof): broaden triggers and surface markdown viewing#618
Conversation
Rewrite the skill description and reframe the HITL section so the skill reliably triggers on direct user requests — including viewing or rendering a local markdown file in Proof, not just upstream-caller handoffs. Tightens the negative clause to cleanly exclude evidence and "proofread this" senses of "proof". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5c034f8caf
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
The description's negative clause excludes bare "proof this doc" as a proofread request, but the HITL Review Mode section still listed it as a direct-request example — an internal contradiction that could route copy-editing asks into the Proof upload flow. Swap in a clearer "open this in proof editor so I can review" example that unambiguously invokes the shared-editor surface. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Apr 21, 2026
Merged
Closed
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
ce-proofskill now reliably triggers on direct user requests to share, view, iterate on, or HITL a markdown file via Proof, not just upstream-caller handoffs fromce-brainstorm/ce-ideate/ce-plan. Markdown viewing (upload a local.md, get a rendered shareable URL) is surfaced as a first-class use case alongside the HITL review workflow the description previously led with.Under the hood, the HITL Review Mode section now names "Direct user request" as a first-class entry point next to the upstream-handoff path, so a bare user phrase like "share this to proof so we can iterate" no longer needs a caller. The description itself drops prose decision trees and meta-commentary in favor of intent-first trigger phrasings, with one compact negative clause that excludes evidence, mathematical/logical proofs, burden of proof, proof-of-concept, and bare "proofread this" senses of the word.