[Search v1] - Unable to sort expenses by "Type", and "Receipt"

[lanitochka17]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.81-1
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Unable to check
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Issue found when executing PR #43206

Action Performed:

1. Navigate to https://staging.new.expensify.com/
2. Log in with an account that has a few expenses
3. Open Search
4. Sort by "Type", and "Receipt"

Expected Result:

I should be able to sort the columns

Actual Result:

Unable to sort expenses by "Type", and "Receipt"

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6508185_1718031580980.bandicam_2024-06-10_16-52-31-375.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @jasperhuangg (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[lanitochka17]

@jasperhuangg FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors

[Kicu]

Sorting by these 2 columns was explicitly disabled by us. When I implemented sorting @luacmartins said that for now we are not able to support sorting by these values.

I leave it to others to verify if this should be treated as a bug or something to keep for now.

[luacmartins]

Correct, this is not available yet. Closing.