[Due for payment 2025-03-03] Strengthening Regression Coverage in OptionsListUtils Tests

[mountiny]

Proposal: Strengthening Regression Coverage in OptionsListUtils Tests

Background:

The OptionsListUtils library provides filtering and ordering capabilities for option lists. Automated reassurance tests are used to verify the correctness of its filterAndOrderOptions function. These tests play a crucial role in catching regressions and maintaining the performance and stability of the function. However, gaps in test coverage may lead to undetected issues, which could affect application behavior in production.

Problem:

Current test cases do not account for scenario when the filterAndOrderOptions processes an empty search value. As a result, regressions related to empty search handling can go unnoticed, which prevents us from ensuring the function's robustness in all edge cases.

Solution:

• Add a test case that explicitly verifies how filterAndOrderOptions behaves with an empty search string.
• Modify the test configuration for OptionsListUtils.getValidOptions to ensure the tests are more resistant to regression failures.

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @slafortune

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @slafortune (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details. Please add this Feature request to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[sosek108]

Hey, its Hubert from Callstack and I would like to work on this issue

[ishpaul777]

👋 @mjasikowski Please assign me here (c+ on #57176)