Percentage - Any amount is reflected as percentage when splitting expense

[lanitochka17]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: v9.2.82-0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: N/A - new feature, doesn't exist in prod
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from BrowserStack: #74652
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): testpayment935@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Bug source: Pull Request QA execution
Device used: Windows 11 pro /Chrome
App Component: Money Requests

Action Performed:

1. Navigate to staging.new.expensify.com
2. Create expense in WS
3. Open expense detail page > More > Split
4. Change the first split amount ( e.g. - 200)
5. Navigate to percentage option

Expected Result:

The edited split amount only showed in the amount page.

Actual Result:

The edited split amount gets reflected to the percentage even if it is above 100%

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

• Android: App
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: App
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• iOS: mWeb Chrome
• Windows: Chrome
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screenshots/Videos

Bug7033139_1766085332301.bandicam_2025-12-18_22-08-23-798.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @CortneyOfstad (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @cristipaval (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[melvin-bot]

💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[ikevin127]

✅ I remember this behaviour as being expected during PR phase, here's the expectation from reviewer and me confirming this being addressed.