Skip to content

Conversation

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor

@azimgd azimgd commented Jan 10, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ 6883
PROPOSAL: 6883

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android

@azimgd azimgd requested a review from a team as a code owner January 10, 2023 00:42
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from techievivek and removed request for a team January 10, 2023 00:43
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 10, 2023

@techievivek Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@azimgd azimgd marked this pull request as draft January 10, 2023 00:44
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

We'll need to change this PR to imported the scoped @expensify/react-native-key-command package!

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 11, 2023

waiting for the package to be published.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I am on flaky internet till 15 JAN so my reviews can be delayed. I see we are waiting on the final package also. let's get everything ready on this PR.

  1. Test steps for all platforms.
  2. QA steps for all platforms.
  3. Offline steps.
  4. Videos.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I didn't get to this one today. I'll get back to it tomorrow!

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@azimgd left a comment about publishing the package to npm

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 16, 2023

@luacmartins wrapping up my PR and will un-publish the package tomorrow.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, let me know when it's done and I'll work on publishing it from our end. Thanks!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I am up with the speed now and I will test it once you are done with package changes.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@azimgd did you get a chance to unpublish the package?

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 19, 2023

yes. 👍

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I tried publishing but it seems like there's a 24h wait period. I'll try again tomorrow!

403 Forbidden - PUT https://registry.npmjs.org/react-native-key-command - react-native-key-command cannot be republished until 24 hours have passed.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Package published!

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@azimgd what's the latest update on this one?

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 24, 2023

Android commands:
CTRL+K: adb shell "input keyevent 113 && input keyevent 39"
CTRL+SHIFT+K: adb shell "input keyevent 113 && input keyevent 39 && input keyevent 59"
CTRL+I: adb shell "input keyevent 113 && input keyevent 37"
ESC: adb shell "input keyevent 111"

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 26, 2023

Let's start with the code review when you get a chance. I would like to know if you have any comments on the approach.

Overall just couple of things are missing there:

  • Using priority argument
  • Debug cmd + enter shortcut

Tested on:

  • web
  • ios
  • android

https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/14168/files

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 30, 2023

@azimgd Let's merge main in this first.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 30, 2023

@parasharrajat merged

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BUG: The web shortcut CTRL+ I does not work on firefox and chrome. It is working on staging.

  • Pressing CTRL+ I opens page info dialog on this branch.

Same for CTRL + K & CTRL + SHIFT + K.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 30, 2023

Mac ?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

It does not matter if the platform is Mac or not. It is the web so it should work everywhere. I will test on Mac as well. Give me 10 mins.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 30, 2023

I'm well aware of the fact that it should work on any platform. I asked you which platform are you testing on.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Jan 30, 2023

Ok, Mac works.
On Mac, I am using CMD+ I but on Linux ctrl+ I does not work. Same for chrome.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 30, 2023

updated.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 31, 2023

@parasharrajat any more feedback?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Testing it again in a few minutes.

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Jan 31, 2023

Have you had a chance to test ?


keyboardShortcutModalContainer: {
maxHeight: '100%',
flex: '0 0 auto',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's revert this change which is unnecessary to this PR.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RN doesn't support '0 0 auto'.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Jan 31, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I am seeing a bad design for the keyboard shortcut Modal. So let's fix that as well.

The modal height is not correct. This is not present on staging.
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed by removing flexGrow on CONST.MODAL.MODAL_TYPE.CENTERED_UNSWIPEABLE.

That is being used at:

  • KeyboardShortcutsModal
  • AttachmentModal

Tested against production, results look coorect.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What are the future plans for this PR? I see that priority is not yet implemented. Why is this still in draft mode?

Can you please add details of the logical changes in the PR description?

Comment on lines +180 to +189
KEYCOMMAND_LIBRARY_SPECIFIC_KEYS: [
[['CTRL'], {
DEFAULT: KeyCommand.constants.keyModifierControl,
[PLATFORM_OS_MACOS]: KeyCommand.constants.keyModifierCommand,
}],
[['CTRL', 'SHIFT'], {
DEFAULT: KeyCommand.constants.keyModifierControlShift,
[PLATFORM_OS_MACOS]: KeyCommand.constants.keyModifierShiftCommand,
}],
],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@luacmartins Do you think it's readable? Do you have any suggestions for this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we try to keep it more in line with what we have here?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be use CONST to map the platform keys and then map the correct combinations to the keyCommand consts in the function itself.

}

return () => unsubscribe(displayName, callbackID);
return () => {};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How are we controlling the unsubscribing now?

@azimgd
Copy link
Contributor Author

azimgd commented Feb 2, 2023

Closing this in favor of #14767

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants