Skip to content

Conversation

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor

@Skalakid Skalakid commented May 29, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ 17027
PROPOSAL: 17027

Tests

To make testing easier and safe some time you can make some changes in code to navigate directly to the Terms and fees screen in EnablePaymentsPage.

In EnablePaymentsPage.js change:

        ...
-      return (
-            <>
-                 {(currentStep === CONST.WALLET.STEP.ADDITIONAL_DETAILS || currentStep === CONST.WALLET.STEP.ADDITIONAL_DETAILS_KBA) && <AdditionalDetailsStep />}
-                  {currentStep === CONST.WALLET.STEP.ONFIDO && <OnfidoStep />}
-                  {currentStep === CONST.WALLET.STEP.TERMS && <TermsStep />}
-                  {currentStep === CONST.WALLET.STEP.ACTIVATE && <ActivateStep userWallet={this.props.userWallet} />}
-             </>
-      );
+      return (
+       <TermsStep />
+      )

and in FloatingActionButtonAndPopover.js change:

         ...
         text: this.props.translate('iou.splitBill'),
-        onSelected: () => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.IOU_BILL),
+        onSelected: () => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.ENABLE_PAYMENTS),

Now you can navigate to the proper screen simply by clicking + button and choosing Split bill option 😉

Or instead of modifying FloatingActionButtonAndPopover.js you can deep-link into the enable-payments page:

  • Android: adb shell am start -a android.intent.action.VIEW -d new-expensify://enable-payments
  • iOS: xcrun simctl openurl booted new-expensify://enable-payments
  • Web/mWeb: go to /enable-payments in the browser
  • Desktop: I changed navigation method in FloatingActionButtonAndPopover.js 🤷‍♂️

Then you can start testing:

  1. Log in
  2. Navigate to /enable-page normally or using methods described above
  3. Click on A list of all Expensify Wallet fees item. Verify the styling and the behaviour of the component.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Have an account (under the wallet beta) with a silver/pending wallet. Note: every account under the wallet beta has a silver wallet created automatically.
  2. If this account does not have a personal bank account (PBA) set up, follow the below steps:
  • Log into NewDot and navigate to Settings > Payments > Add payment method > Bank account
  • Select Connect via plaid and use the following credentials:
Wells Fargo
Username: user_good
password: pass_good
Mobile verification code: credential_good
Plaid saving
  1. Have another user request money to the user you are testing with
  2. Attempt to pay the money request and verify the KYC wall is triggered
  3. In the additional details form, enter first name Alberta, last name Charleson and SSN as 3333. Enter any data for the other fields.
  4. Click Save & continue
  5. In Verify identity page click Continue
  6. In Terms and fees page click on A list of all Expensify Wallet fees item. Verify the styling and the behaviour of the component.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
WEB.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
web-mobile-chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
web-mobile-safari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@Skalakid Skalakid requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2023 17:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from stitesExpensify and removed request for a team May 29, 2023 17:49
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 29, 2023

@stitesExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, leaving testing to @fedirjh

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 29, 2023

@Skalakid, @stitesExpensify Looks good , just noticed that text is selectable which is different from old behaviour

Screen.Recording.2023-05-29.at.9.24.26.PM.mov

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 29, 2023

We also have this warning which doesn’t seems related to this PR , but it looks to be related with PressableWithFeedback component

Screenshot 2023-05-29 at 9 21 44 PM

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 29, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Safari.mov
Desktop
Desktop.mov
iOS
IOS.mov
Android
AAndrroidd.mov

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 29, 2023

@Skalakid for QA steps , maybe we can add similar steps to #14988

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skalakid commented May 31, 2023

We also have this warning which doesn’t seems related to this PR , but it looks to be related with PressableWithFeedback component

Screenshot 2023-05-29 at 9 21 44 PM

@fedirjh I think it is because of the missing accessibility label, which is required. @robertKozik I think it can be fixed in your PR #18792, can you check it out?

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!👋🏼
PR #18792 will solve this problem which you encountered. It marks the PressableWithFeedback as non-accessible (as we have accessible checkbox itself, and this is only clickable label) so it won't require the accessibility label.

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skalakid commented May 31, 2023

@Skalakid for QA steps , maybe we can add similar steps to #14988

@fedirjh for sure the steps that you mentioned are better, but I can't reproduce them :( After adding a bank account I can't go further. Do you know how can I enable paying with the bank account and be able to pass threw enable payments page to terms and fees page?
Zrzut ekranu 2023-05-31 o 13 48 06

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented May 31, 2023

but I can't reproduce them :( After adding a bank account I can't go further.

@Skalakid It require wallet beta access , as of #14988 (comment) , QA can access it using an expensifail account. I think it will be fine to add those test to QA section and keep dev tests as they’re

@robertKozik
Copy link
Contributor

@Skalakid @fedirjh the PR which should resolve the accessibilityLabel errors was merged. So error you encoutered should be gone.

@Skalakid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skalakid commented Jun 2, 2023

@fedirjh I've just added those tests to QA section :D And like @robertKozik said, the erros are gone

@Skalakid Skalakid requested a review from stitesExpensify June 2, 2023 13:24
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests well

cc @stitesExpensify all yours

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

Copy link
Contributor

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stitesExpensify stitesExpensify merged commit fc30ddc into Expensify:main Jun 2, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 2, 2023

Congrats, that’s your 5th PR merged! 🎉 Do you know about the ContributorPlus role? It’s an opportunity to earn more in the Expensify Open Source community. Keep up the great work - thanks!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 2, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stitesExpensify in version: 1.3.24-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@isagoico
Copy link

isagoico commented Jun 6, 2023

This PR is failing QA because of issue #20280

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 7, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.24-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 7, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.24-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants