Update empty field check logic #26643

Gonals · 2023-09-04T10:14:15Z

Details

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/313812

Coming from this comment

Tests

Follow the steps in Display Smartscan errors #26155. Try requesting money both from another individual and a workspace.
Follow the steps again, but populating all fields when smartscanning. Confirm no red dot displays in that case.
Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

None

QA Steps

Same as Display Smartscan errors #26155
Try the same steps, but with a receipt with all fields visible, so it smartscans correctly. No red dot should show in that case.
Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

melvin-bot · 2023-09-04T10:14:19Z

@Santhosh-Sellavel Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

MariaHCD · 2023-09-04T10:34:52Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.2.53.38.PM.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.2.58.31.PM.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.3.00.58.PM.mov

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.2.36.40.PM.mov

iOS

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.3.08.39.PM.mov

Android

Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.3.48.49.PM.mov

mountiny · 2023-09-04T10:37:26Z

src/libs/TransactionUtils.js

 */
-function areModifiedFieldsPopulated(transaction) {
-    return transaction.modifiedMerchant !== CONST.TRANSACTION.UNKNOWN_MERCHANT && transaction.modifiedAmount !== 0 && transaction.modifiedCreated !== '';
+function areRequiredFieldsEmpty(transaction) {


We will have conflicts with this one #26603 lets merge that first and sync iup this branch with it

That one doesn't touch TransactionUtils 😕

@mountiny @MariaHCD no conflicts 😁

it adds the PARTIAL_TRANSACTION_MERCHANT thats what I meant, maybe there will be no conflict, but I just wanted to go in order 😅 been waiting hours for someone to merge it

Ah, I added at the exact same spot and with the same name on purpose, to avoid conflicts 😁

MariaHCD · 2023-09-04T11:50:07Z

Tests worked as expected! Are we good to merge?

Gonals · 2023-09-04T11:57:08Z

Tests worked as expected! Are we good to merge?

I think so! Let's do it!

OSBotify · 2023-09-04T12:04:00Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2023-09-04T16:49:43Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 1.3.63-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-09-05T18:42:18Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.63-2 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-09-05T19:12:41Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 1.3.64-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-09-06T18:55:16Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.64-2 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

Update empty field check logic

1fb0c2b

Gonals requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2023 10:14

melvin-bot bot requested review from Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team September 4, 2023 10:14

Gonals requested review from MariaHCD and mountiny and removed request for Santhosh-Sellavel and mountiny September 4, 2023 10:14

prettier

43eaa87

MariaHCD approved these changes Sep 4, 2023

View reviewed changes

mountiny reviewed Sep 4, 2023

View reviewed changes

mountiny assigned Gonals Sep 4, 2023

Merge branch 'main' into alberto-checkfields

60576f0

MariaHCD merged commit 7eb96d8 into main Sep 4, 2023

MariaHCD deleted the alberto-checkfields branch September 4, 2023 11:57

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-09-04 #26686

Closed

35 tasks

lanitochka17 mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2023-09-15] Request money - Merchant name is not indicated as unknown merchant #26759

Closed

6 tasks

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Sep 5, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-09-05 #26820

Closed

48 tasks

Update empty field check logic #26643

Update empty field check logic #26643

Uh oh!

Conversation

Gonals commented Sep 4, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 4, 2023

Uh oh!

MariaHCD commented Sep 4, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

mountiny Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Gonals Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Gonals Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mountiny Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Gonals Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

MariaHCD commented Sep 4, 2023

Uh oh!

Gonals commented Sep 4, 2023

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Sep 4, 2023

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Sep 4, 2023

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Sep 5, 2023

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Sep 5, 2023

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Sep 6, 2023

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

MariaHCD commented Sep 4, 2023 •

edited

Loading