Skip to content

Conversation

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz commented Feb 14, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #24928
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Go to settings of a workspace that you own (or have admin permissions).
  • Go to Reimbursements section and press Connect bank account.
  • Test both options for adding account (plaid and manual).
  • Verify that all steps are present in setup flow.
  • Verify that going backward and forward preserves entered data.
  • Verify if errors appear when incorrect data is entered and if those errors are relevant.
  • Check if canceling (Start over button) the flow at any point does not cause problems with future bank account setups.(e.g. if old errors don't appear in future setups and information related to previous setup is removed).

Offline tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Not sure if there are any videos to include since the pr modifies action code.

Android: Native
Android.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Android.mweb.mov
iOS: Native
iOS.native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
iOS.mweb.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS.browser.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor comments, otherwise LGTM!

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2024 13:54
@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 13:54
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aimane-chnaif and removed request for a team and VickyStash March 12, 2024 13:54
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2024

@aimane-chnaif @ One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

QA Steps is missing for this big change?

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuuszzzzz I agree with Aimane, let's fill out tests and QA sections

Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that lots of unused functions are removed but was it discussed?

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2024

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #24928 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Mar 12, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuuszzzzz please merge main. 3.8k commits are too much 😮

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@mateuuszzzzz or @blazejkustra can someone merge main please

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mateuuszzzzz or @blazejkustra can someone merge main please

I’ll take care of it soon

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny @aimane-chnaif done

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see that lots of unused functions are removed but was it discussed?

According to this. We had discussion about deleting them in this PR and decided to do it since those functions are pretty old

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

aimane-chnaif commented Mar 13, 2024

This is out of scope (happens on main) but I think this is something to fix. "No error message" is confusing. User doesn't know what the issue is without seeing console log.

Screenshot 2024-03-13 at 10 54 01 AM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny March 13, 2024 11:55
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mateuuszzzzz thanks! Have you tested the full flow in the bank account and added the testing bank account succefully? Then also removed it?

Seems like there is couple of changes different from the JS so curious why they needed and hence I think we need to be thorough with testing here

{
onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.SET,
key: ONYXKEYS.FORMS.REIMBURSEMENT_ACCOUNT_FORM_DRAFT,
value: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the js file we just set this to empty object, why this change

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mateuuszzzzz mateuuszzzzz Mar 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly here typecheck throws an error, because keys of the type used here are not optional

[BANK_INFO_STEP_KEYS.ACCOUNT_NUMBER]: '',
[BANK_INFO_STEP_KEYS.PLAID_MASK]: '',
[BANK_INFO_STEP_KEYS.IS_SAVINGS]: '',
[BANK_INFO_STEP_KEYS.IS_SAVINGS]: false,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this change needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before migration we had incorrect type value here. After migration typecheck throws type mismatch so it had to be changed. Since empty string is falsy I assume using false boolean value is fine here.

CITY: 'requestorAddressCity',
STATE: 'requestorAddressState',
ZIP_CODE: 'requestorAddressZipCode',
IS_ONFIDO_SETUP_COMPLETE: 'isOnfidoSetupComplete',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need this new input id here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mateuuszzzzz commented Mar 13, 2024

@mateuuszzzzz thanks! Have you tested the full flow in the bank account and added the testing bank account succefully? Then also removed it?

Seems like there is couple of changes different from the JS so curious why they needed and hence I think we need to be thorough with testing here

@mountiny In general, I have a problem with verification via Onfido without a social security number, but this is not related to this PR. Similarly for Plaid even if the first steps are successful the verification step cannot be passed. Is there any example data that is valid and complete? All examples on #expensify-open-source seem to be outdated or incomplete.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

The logic change in this PR is resetFreePlanBankAccount flow so I think that test should be enough.

@kubabutkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

image
@mateuuszzzzz you can use those values to pass verification

@mateuuszzzzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny In my case setup was successful

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 62b1b35 into Expensify:main Mar 15, 2024
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.54-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.4.54-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants