Skip to content

Scroll highlight feature for workspace member page#38036

Merged
luacmartins merged 7 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
shubham1206agra:scroll-highlight
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Scroll highlight feature for workspace member page#38036
luacmartins merged 7 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
shubham1206agra:scroll-highlight

Conversation

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra commented Mar 11, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #35717

Tests

  1. Open Workspace where you want to add members.
  2. Add new members using Invite Members flow.
  3. Observe that it scrolls to the first new added member, and it highlights new members for some time.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.7.09.25.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.6.44.06.PM.mov
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.6.27.11.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.6.28.29.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.6.12.58.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.6.51.18.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra requested a review from a team as a code owner March 11, 2024 11:42
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ishpaul777 and removed request for a team March 11, 2024 11:42
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 11, 2024

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ishpaul777 Scroll feature might misbehave as it is a known bug.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny I am currently using fixed timing approach instead of focus till interaction as it is very hard to implement due to multiple extra re-renders which I am unable to control.

return;
}
const invitedEmails = Object.values(invitedEmailsToAccountIDsDraft).map(String);
selectionListRef.current?.scrollAndHighlightItem?.(invitedEmails, 1500);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to decide time here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Expensify/design How long should the highlight be there for?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, so just to clarify, we are not doing the original idea where it stays highlighted until another action is taken? The highlight will always be ephemeral?

If that's the case I don't have strong feelings on an exact time... somewhere between 1.5-3 seconds seems fine to me?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, so just to clarify, we are not doing the original idea where it stays highlighted until another action is taken? The highlight will always be ephemeral?

@shawnborton We are using a fixed time approach only right now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, no strong feelings in terms of time then - perhaps let's see some screen recordings of a few different options?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1500ms (current)

Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.8.35.00.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That feels pretty good, but can we have the background color fade out instead of just change at the end?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would be a great improvement, @shubham1206agra ^

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will most probably be added later in a follow-up PR as discussed with @mountiny in Slack.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

smallll nitpick: 1500 should have been in CONST file

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

it is very hard to implement due to multiple extra re-renders which I am unable to control.

Could you define this problem a bit more specifically and bring it to slack, possible #newdot-performance and we could brainstorm with agency workers how to achieve this

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ishpaul777 @shubham1206agra Given this is bigger change to the BaseSelectionList component, can you please add tests for other places where the SelectionList component is used? Also make sure Tab+Enter navigation is working as expected there etc.

Thanks

Keyboard.dismiss();
// Please see https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/README.md#Security for more details
Policy.addMembersToWorkspace(invitedEmailsToAccountIDsDraft ?? {}, welcomeNote ?? '', route.params.policyID);
Policy.setWorkspaceInviteMembersDraft(route.params.policyID, {});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noted in the other file, why did this need to be moved

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is written in document. Its main purpose to get invite list when sending the invite request.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we still want to clear this list, no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We clear it here #38036 (comment)

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

I saw when I added new members, it re-renders with old members list, and then with new member list multiple times. And another problem I will highlight here, is that it might get laggy as I have to run highlight cleanup logic on every interaction which involves a Onyx cleanup logic, which might introduce performance issues.

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Mar 11, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.11.43.33.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.11.00.06.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.11.19.04.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.10.40.51.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.11.01.41.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.11.23.29.PM-1.mov

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Cool ok, I think we can leave the fade for later and explore if the highlight approach is doable

Comment on lines +387 to +407
const scrollAndHighlightItem = useCallback(
(items: string[], timeout: number) => {
const newItemsToHighlight = new Set<string>();
items.forEach((item) => {
newItemsToHighlight.add(item);
});
const index = flattenedSections.allOptions.findIndex((option) => newItemsToHighlight.has(option.keyForList));
updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex(index);
setItemToHighlight(newItemsToHighlight);

if (itemFocusTimeoutRef.current) {
clearTimeout(itemFocusTimeoutRef.current);
}

itemFocusTimeoutRef.current = setTimeout(() => {
setFocusedIndex(-1);
setItemToHighlight(null);
}, timeout);
},
[flattenedSections.allOptions, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex],
);
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 Mar 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Scroll feature might misbehave as it is a known bug.

just for future note that scroll just end above the item in list

Screen.Recording.2024-03-11.at.10.40.51.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did this happen on mWeb only? Do we need to add an offset with the item height?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This happens on all platforms.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny March 11, 2024 18:16
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra can you resolve conflicts please?

Comment on lines +387 to +407
const scrollAndHighlightItem = useCallback(
(items: string[], timeout: number) => {
const newItemsToHighlight = new Set<string>();
items.forEach((item) => {
newItemsToHighlight.add(item);
});
const index = flattenedSections.allOptions.findIndex((option) => newItemsToHighlight.has(option.keyForList));
updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex(index);
setItemToHighlight(newItemsToHighlight);

if (itemFocusTimeoutRef.current) {
clearTimeout(itemFocusTimeoutRef.current);
}

itemFocusTimeoutRef.current = setTimeout(() => {
setFocusedIndex(-1);
setItemToHighlight(null);
}, timeout);
},
[flattenedSections.allOptions, updateAndScrollToFocusedIndex],
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did this happen on mWeb only? Do we need to add an offset with the item height?

Keyboard.dismiss();
// Please see https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/README.md#Security for more details
Policy.addMembersToWorkspace(invitedEmailsToAccountIDsDraft ?? {}, welcomeNote ?? '', route.params.policyID);
Policy.setWorkspaceInviteMembersDraft(route.params.policyID, {});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we still want to clear this list, no?

luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM we can look at this issue in the follow up - #38036 (comment)

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting for conflicts resolution

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 5ec1325 into Expensify:main Mar 13, 2024
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.52-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.4.52-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants