Conversation
|
There are usages of Expensify.cash in |
|
Yeah, I wasn't sure about changing those or not, and I think I'd rather err
on the side of not changing them. The IOU reference is in a link that goes
to Venmo, and I'm not sure if changing that would break anything.
The ones in the electron configuration I didn't know if they might break
something in the build and deploy process or not, so I left those alone too.
…On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:01 AM Monil Bhavsar ***@***.***> wrote:
There are usages of Expensify.cash in
Expensify.cash/config/electron.config.js and
Expensify.cash/src/libs/actions/IOU.js L163.
Not sure if we need to update it.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4091 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJMAB3R4P5OS6CGQB2ESHTTX7DNJANCNFSM5AOLOETQ>
.
|
|
Hey @kevinksullivan here are the copy changes I had. There is some confusion and inconsistency about the Spanish translations (see this slack convo) which we need to try and resolve. |
|
I also believe there was some conversation about |
src/languages/es.js
Outdated
| }, | ||
| termsOfUse: { | ||
| phrase1: 'Al usar Expensify.cash, estás aceptando los', | ||
| phrase1: 'Al usar Nuevo Expensify, estás aceptando los', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The english version of this leaves out the name of the app. I think we should do the same here.
English:
By logging in, you agree to the
@iwiznia @marklouisdeshaun what is the proper translation into Spanish?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By logging in, you agree to the
Al iniciar sesión, estás accediendo a los
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nope, seems it's missing a line? Is this the up to date copy?
termsOfUse: {
phrase1: 'By logging in, you agree to the',
phrase2: 'terms of service',
phrase3: 'and',
phrase4: 'privacy policy',
phrase5: 'Money transmission is provided by Expensify Payments LLC (NMLS',
phrase6: 'ID:2017010) pursuant to its',
phrase7: 'licenses',
},
If so:
termsOfUse: {
phrase1: 'Al usar Expensify.cash, estás aceptando los',
phrase2: 'términos de servicio',
phrase3: 'y',
phrase4: 'política de privacidad',
phrase5: 'El envío de dinero es brindado por Expensify Payments LLC (NMLS',
phrase6: 'ID:2017010) de conformidad con sus',
phrase7: 'licencias',
},
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, so sorry... I was looking at the welcome text 🤦
OK, I think I've got it right if you want to check the changes in this PR.
|
I updated this again after a couple of Slack discussions. Adding a few of our Spanish experts to the review. |
|
bump for review please (there are a few of you assigned) |
iwiznia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just reviewing the spanish translations
Co-authored-by: Ionatan Wiznia <ionatan@expensify.com>
Co-authored-by: Ionatan Wiznia <ionatan@expensify.com>
|
Good catches, @iwiznia. I've applied those. |
src/languages/en.js
Outdated
| phoneCountryCode: '1', | ||
| welcomeText: { | ||
| phrase1: 'Welcome to the New Expensify! Enter your phone number or email to continue.', | ||
| phrase1: 'Welcome to New Expensify! Enter your phone number or email to continue.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on David's Vatican reference, my understanding is the home page saying "the New Expensify" makes sense here.
src/languages/en.js
Outdated
| expensifyDotCash: 'Expensify.cash', | ||
| expensifyIsOpenSource: 'The New Expensify is open source', | ||
| expensifyDotCash: 'New Expensify', | ||
| expensifyIsOpenSource: 'New Expensify is open source', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to my comment above, if we decide to use "the" at all, this seems like the other sensible place to do so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we want to use "the" here because this ends up as the header of the page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, hold on, I was looking at the line above it for expensifyDotCash.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The phrase for expensifyIsOpenSource is not referenced anywhere, so I will just remove it. I've updated this branch.
kevinksullivan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added two comments about the insertion of "the" based on my understanding of this conversation. Ultimately these are nitpicks, so feel free to carry on without making the tweaks.
|
OK, fixed conflicts again, can someone please merge it? It's been approved several times now 😁 |
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging in version: 1.0.82-8🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by @francoisl in version: 1.0.83-1 🚀
|

Details
Fixed Issues
$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/170729
Tests
QA Steps
Same as tests
Tested On
Screenshots
Web
Mobile Web
Desktop
iOS
Android