Conversation
assets/images/simple-illustrations/simple-illustration__drafts.svg
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
assets/images/simple-illustrations/simple-illustration__finished.svg
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
assets/images/simple-illustrations/simple-illustration__shared.svg
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@Kicu yup, I believe it works as expected:
|
|
The screenshots look cool, but just wondering how we want to handle this UI in light of Search v2? Thoughts @Expensify/design @JmillsExpensify @luacmartins? Should we be making these as tabs across the top of the content pane view? |
|
Oh boy, yeah I think we should 😬 |
|
Yeah, that probably makes sense. |
|
Discussed this with @trjExpensify and @JmillsExpensify but I think we still want to push forward as is, since we're still months out on Search v2 and adding these items to the LHN would allow us to test things in the meantime without the LHN looking really empty and weird. Additionally, we still need to design the tab bar and how its filtering capabilities would work, so this is a good stepping stone in the meantime. |
|
Yes agreed. I can see both perspectives, but if we move the type filter to the LHN, then it'll basically remain |
|
Okay cool, that works for me then. |
|
🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪 |
|
Looks good to me, confirming that changing the canned search doesn't actually load results except for the first item of Expenses, right? |
|
I see a very different UI for search. Am I missing a step? Screen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.41.54.AM.mov |
|
@parasharrajat this is for the new search page. You can access it via |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.51.45.AM.mov🔲 iOS / SafariScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.53.14.AM.mov🔲 MacOS / DesktopScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.54.36.AM.mov🔲 MacOS / ChromeScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.48.42.AM.mov🔲 Android / ChromeScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.51.15.AM.mov🔲 Android / nativeScreen.Recording.2024-05-29.at.1.55.08.AM.mov |
|
@jnowakow Did you replace the icons with the latest shared ones? |
parasharrajat
left a comment
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
One comment #42184 (comment). I will review it again when HOLD is removed. |
| action: 'Acción', | ||
| expenses: 'Gastos', | ||
| tax: 'Impuesto', | ||
| shared: 'Compartido', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| shared: 'Compartido', | |
| shared: 'Compartidos', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bump @jnowakow. I think we should change this to plural since all other ones are plural too
| tax: 'Impuesto', | ||
| shared: 'Compartido', | ||
| drafts: 'Borradores', | ||
| finished: 'Finalizado', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| finished: 'Finalizado', | |
| finished: 'Finalizados', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Haha I asked for another translation and got the plural like I suggested above. I think it makes sense to use the plural, since all other items are plural too, e.g. Expenses, Drafts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bump @jnowakow. I think we should change this to plural since all other ones are plural too
@parasharrajat |
|
Shouldn't the edge gap be removed from the checkmark icon like other icons? @Expensify/design |
|
I think that one is fine as-is, that's how we have it in our system at least. |
|
We can make it fill up more space if anyone feels strongly though. Thoughts @Expensify/design ? |
|
Unless it looks really odd in product, I think it's fine as is 👍 Our icons and colored illustrations use very different spacing by design :) |
| action: 'Acción', | ||
| expenses: 'Gastos', | ||
| tax: 'Impuesto', | ||
| shared: 'Compartido', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bump @jnowakow. I think we should change this to plural since all other ones are plural too
| tax: 'Impuesto', | ||
| shared: 'Compartido', | ||
| drafts: 'Borradores', | ||
| finished: 'Finalizado', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bump @jnowakow. I think we should change this to plural since all other ones are plural too
luacmartins
changed the title
luacmartins
left a comment
luacmartins
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm gonna merge this PR to help test the other queries.
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
This PR is failing because of issue #43051 The issue is reproducible in: All environments Bug6501851_1717522666977.video_24.mp4 |
|
Verified that this is not a problem, as the rest of tabs was explicitly disabled by us here: #43016 |
|
Agree with the comment above |
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.79-11 🚀
|
10 participants
Details
Fixed Issues
$ #41625
PROPOSAL: N/A
Tests
Profile > Troubleshoot > New search pageExpensesoption works because other are not implemented on backend.Offline tests
N/A
QA Steps
Same as in Tests
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)myBool && <MyComponent />.src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-web.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Desktop.mov