Skip to content

fix: Onboarding - You appears to be offline appears in left without margin.#60944

Merged
srikarparsi merged 11 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/60643
May 7, 2025
Merged

fix: Onboarding - You appears to be offline appears in left without margin.#60944
srikarparsi merged 11 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/60643

Conversation

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented Apr 26, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #60643
PROPOSAL: #60643 (comment)

Tests

  1. Create a new account with any gmail id
  2. Tap join
  3. Turn off internet
  4. Verify offline message has left padding on "What's your work email" page
  5. Tap skip
  6. Verify offline message has left padding in "What you want to do today"
  7. Test all the pages in each option on "What you want to do today" and verify offline message has left padding
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  • Need to create the account with internet connection
  1. Create a new account with any gmail id
  2. Tap join
  3. Turn off internet
  4. Verify offline message has left padding on "What's your work email" page
  5. Tap skip
  6. Verify offline message has left padding in "What you want to do today"
  7. Test all the pages in each option on "What you want to do today" and verify offline message has left padding

QA Steps

  1. Create a new account with any gmail id
  2. Tap join
  3. Turn off internet
  4. Verify offline message has left padding on "What's your work email" page
  5. Tap skip
  6. Verify offline message has left padding in "What you want to do today"
  7. Test all the pages in each option on "What you want to do today" and verify offline message has left padding
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_app.mp4

…argin.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as ready for review April 26, 2025 19:53
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 26, 2025 19:53
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for a team April 26, 2025 19:53
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 26, 2025

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why the checks are failing, doesn't seem to be related to this PR.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Are we good with other onboarding steps? Please check that.
  2. Make sure design is not changed with your changes.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

We might have to merge main to solve this. Keep a watch on slack for this.

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

Krishna2323 commented Apr 28, 2025

@parasharrajat, I have verified the changes again, and they work fine based on my testing. In the comparison below, the emulator is running the main branch.

Work emails (Android Chrome) Work emails (Android Native)
work_email_page work_email_page_offline
Purpose (Android Chrome) Purpose (Android Native)
purpose_page purpose_page_offline
Personal Details (Android Chrome) Personal Details (Android Native)
personal_details_page personal_details_page_offline
Employees (Android Chrome) Employees (Android Native)
employees_page employees_page_offline
Accounting (Android Chrome) Accounting (Android Native)
accounting_page accounting_page_offline

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat, friendly bump for review.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented May 2, 2025

@Krishna2323 I can see that there are a few onboarding steps where we are showing indicator all the time but here we are only showing on small screens. What is reason for that difference?

@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can see that there are a few onboarding steps where we are showing indicator all the time

@parasharrajat, I'm not sure which specific onboarding step you're referring to—could you please clarify?

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
progressBarPercentage={isPrivateDomainAndHasAccesiblePolicies ? 60 : 20}
/>
<ScreenWrapper
includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this is false here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 May 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My mistake — it shouldn't be false here because we were using the safe area padding bottom with SafeAreaConsumer. Updated.

<ScreenWrapper
shouldEnableMaxHeight
shouldShowOfflineIndicator={false}
shouldShowOfflineIndicator={isSmallScreenWidth}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to pass isSmallScreenWidth to shouldShowOfflineIndicator prop in ScreenWrapper. Internally, it uses this. We also don't need to pass this prop as it is true by default.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is extra margin between the continue button and offline indicator on

  1. Employees
  2. Accounting Step.

It should with other screens like personal-details. I think we just need to pass includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom=False to SelectionList on Boarding steps. Please check for other steps as well which use SelectionList.

image

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@Krishna2323 Waiting on your changes to wrap this one

…ing flow.

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323
Copy link
Contributor Author

It should with other screens like personal-details. I think we just need to pass includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom=False to SelectionList on Boarding steps. Please check for other steps as well which use SelectionList.

@parasharrajat, checked and updated. includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false} works well.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented May 6, 2025

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

06.05.2025_16.24.48_REC.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

06.05.2025_16.20.55_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

06.05.2025_17.00.18_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

06.05.2025_15.36.02_REC.mp4
06.05.2025_15.34.49_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / Chrome

06.05.2025_15.54.33_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / native

06.05.2025_16.48.59_REC.mp4

ListItem={RadioListItem}
footerContent={footerContent}
listItemWrapperStyle={onboardingIsMediumOrLargerScreenWidth ? [styles.pl8, styles.pr8] : []}
includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now we should enable the safeAreabottom padding on ScreenWrapper. Same for Accounting step. @Krishna2323

image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat, tested and updated.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from srikarparsi May 6, 2025 23:59
@srikarparsi srikarparsi merged commit 1cbc72c into Expensify:main May 7, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 7, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 9.1.42-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 9.1.43-5 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.1.44-8 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants