fix: Onboarding - You appears to be offline appears in left without margin.#60944
fix: Onboarding - You appears to be offline appears in left without margin.#60944srikarparsi merged 11 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Conversation
…argin. Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
|
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
|
Not sure why the checks are failing, doesn't seem to be related to this PR. |
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Are we good with other onboarding steps? Please check that.
- Make sure design is not changed with your changes.
|
We might have to merge main to solve this. Keep a watch on slack for this. |
|
@parasharrajat, I have verified the changes again, and they work fine based on my testing. In the comparison below, the emulator is running the main branch.
|
|
@parasharrajat, friendly bump for review. |
|
@Krishna2323 I can see that there are a few onboarding steps where we are showing indicator all the time but here we are only showing on small screens. What is reason for that difference? |
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@parasharrajat, I'm not sure which specific onboarding step you're referring to—could you please clarify? |
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
| progressBarPercentage={isPrivateDomainAndHasAccesiblePolicies ? 60 : 20} | ||
| /> | ||
| <ScreenWrapper | ||
| includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My mistake — it shouldn't be false here because we were using the safe area padding bottom with SafeAreaConsumer. Updated.
| <ScreenWrapper | ||
| shouldEnableMaxHeight | ||
| shouldShowOfflineIndicator={false} | ||
| shouldShowOfflineIndicator={isSmallScreenWidth} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think we need to pass isSmallScreenWidth to shouldShowOfflineIndicator prop in ScreenWrapper. Internally, it uses this. We also don't need to pass this prop as it is true by default.
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is extra margin between the continue button and offline indicator on
- Employees
- Accounting Step.
It should with other screens like personal-details. I think we just need to pass includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom=False to SelectionList on Boarding steps. Please check for other steps as well which use SelectionList.
|
@Krishna2323 Waiting on your changes to wrap this one |
…ing flow. Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@parasharrajat, checked and updated. |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / native06.05.2025_16.24.48_REC.mp4🔲 iOS / Safari06.05.2025_16.20.55_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Desktop06.05.2025_17.00.18_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Chrome06.05.2025_15.36.02_REC.mp406.05.2025_15.34.49_REC.mp4🔲 Android / Chrome06.05.2025_15.54.33_REC.mp4🔲 Android / native06.05.2025_16.48.59_REC.mp4 |
| ListItem={RadioListItem} | ||
| footerContent={footerContent} | ||
| listItemWrapperStyle={onboardingIsMediumOrLargerScreenWidth ? [styles.pl8, styles.pr8] : []} | ||
| includeSafeAreaPaddingBottom={false} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Now we should enable the safeAreabottom padding on ScreenWrapper. Same for Accounting step. @Krishna2323
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 9.1.42-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 9.1.43-5 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.1.44-8 🚀
|












Explanation of Change
Fixed Issues
$ #60643
PROPOSAL: #60643 (comment)
Tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectiontoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop_app.mp4