Skip to content

Conversation

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor

@waterim waterim commented May 19, 2025

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #58316
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Test 1:

  1. Go to expense report
  2. Click "More" button
  3. Observe new Export option
  4. Go inside and observe

Test 2:
(to update)

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Details image image image

@waterim waterim changed the title update more button with a new export Feat: Updated the "Download" option to be a push row in both the bulk actions menu and in the More secondary action menu May 19, 2025
@waterim waterim marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 16:35
@waterim waterim requested a review from a team as a code owner May 20, 2025 16:35
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dubielzyk-expensify and rayane-d and removed request for a team May 20, 2025 16:35
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 20, 2025

@dubielzyk-expensify @rayane-d One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor Author

waterim commented May 20, 2025

@flaviadefaria Opened a PR for initial review to understand if Im on the right path and when I get your answer on this I will update that place also with the same behaviour

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review May 20, 2025 18:19
@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

We should be using a different pattern here:

CleanShot 2025-05-21 at 13 13 25@2x

It should look like this:

CleanShot 2025-05-21 at 13 16 40@2x

We have already built this part so it should be available and is used in other parts of the app. I believe you see if when you pay an expense and have multiple accounts set up.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-d
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@luacmartins luacmartins requested review from shubham1206agra and removed request for rayane-d May 22, 2025 17:11
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@waterim is this PR ready for review?

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor Author

waterim commented May 23, 2025

@luacmartins its ready for the review, but Im not sure what @dubielzyk-expensify meant about a different pattern

@flaviadefaria
Copy link
Contributor

@dubielzyk-expensify can you help point @waterim to the correct pattern?

@waterim should we trigger an app build here to make sure that all is working as intended?

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor Author

waterim commented May 27, 2025

@flaviadefaria If its a wrong pattern Im not sure about the build, but if everything is fine - yes, will be good

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

When you click Export, this PR is using the wrong Export row. This is a comparison:

CleanShot 2025-05-28 at 11 09 52@2x

We use this correct pattern in other parts of the app already.

@flaviadefaria
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for clarifying @dubielzyk-expensify ❤️

@flaviadefaria
Copy link
Contributor

So I guess the issue is that options are already not showing in staging when they should... I'll post in the other issue.

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor Author

waterim commented Jun 23, 2025

@flaviadefaria Perfect, thank you for flagging that staging has the same behaviour!

@waterim
Copy link
Contributor Author

waterim commented Jun 23, 2025

@flaviadefaria All other issues should be fixed, right?
Is it a blocker for us, the connected integration?

@flaviadefaria
Copy link
Contributor

@flaviadefaria All other issues should be fixed, right?
Is it a blocker for us, the connected integration?

I need to check one last time, and I'd also like to get confirmation that the broken integration issue will get fixed in the other GH. I'll bump this in today's update in #migrate, and hopefully we can have this merged by tomorrow.

@flaviadefaria
Copy link
Contributor

flaviadefaria commented Jun 25, 2025

@waterim I just re-tested everything, we're good to merge on my end. I'll push to resolve the broken connection issue in this GH since that is where we changed the expected behavior. Thanks for all your help!

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra let's prioritize reviewing this one please!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2025-06-25 at 9 15 41 PM

@Expensify/design Do we allow sub-menu highlighting here? cc @waterim

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Do we allow sub-menu highlighting here?

Yeah that looks like standard behavior for submenus to me. Here's another example from the product: adding an expense to a report.
CleanShot 2025-06-25 at 09 00 55

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Yup, agree with that!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2025-06-25 at 11 11 09 PM

NAB (Unrelated bug) - We should fix this options getting hidden under navigation bar.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • xIf a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.11.10.01.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.10.05.43.PM.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.10.43.24.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.9.55.21.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.9.46.10.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-06-25.at.10.14.20.PM.mov

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 25, 2025

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #58316 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tylerkaraszewski June 25, 2025 17:44
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

userID: 'ID do Usuário',
disable: 'Desativar',
export: 'Exportar',
basicExport: 'Exporta\u00E7\u00E3o b\u00E1sica',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB we can do this in a follow up

Suggested change
basicExport: 'Exporta\u00E7\u00E3o b\u00E1sica',
basicExport: 'Exportação básica',

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit d41364f into Expensify:main Jun 25, 2025
20 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.1.72-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.1.72-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.1.72-10 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.