Skip to content

[CP Staging][Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace#67993

Merged
grgia merged 2 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:korytko/fix-single-expense-no-subscript
Aug 6, 2025
Merged

[CP Staging][Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace#67993
grgia merged 2 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:korytko/fix-single-expense-no-subscript

Conversation

@JakubKorytko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JakubKorytko JakubKorytko commented Aug 6, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fix for workspace's single expenses & invoices in Reports->Chats, header & details page not being displayed as a subscript.

Fixed Issues

$ #67975
$ #67750
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  1. Open Expensify App
  2. Create a workspace
  3. Create two expenses in the workspace chat
  4. Open the expense report, the click on each expense to open expense details page
  5. Verify there is an expense creator avatar with workspace icon in the expense details header
  6. Go to Reports->Chats
  7. Find created expense & report
  8. Verify that proper subscript is displayed there as well

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Web.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@JakubKorytko JakubKorytko changed the title [Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices [Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace Aug 6, 2025
@JakubKorytko JakubKorytko marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 09:26
@JakubKorytko JakubKorytko requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2025 09:26
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from QichenZhu and removed request for a team August 6, 2025 09:26
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 6, 2025

@QichenZhu Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@JakubKorytko
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Unused styles check failing unrelated, it is failing on main as well.

const shouldShowAllActors = displayAllActors && !reportPreviewSenderID;
const isChatThreadOutsideTripRoom = isChatThread(chatReport) && !isATripRoom;
const shouldShowSubscriptAvatar = shouldReportShowSubscript(iouReport ?? chatReport, isReportArchived) && policy?.type !== CONST.POLICY.TYPE.PERSONAL;
const shouldShowSubscriptAvatar = shouldReportShowSubscript(iouReport ?? chatReport, isReportArchived) && isWorkspacePolicy;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldReportShowSubscript

Instead of add the case outside of it, could we update this function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, it's not that easy. It's more a matter of which report to pass and which report to pass to the icons function. For example, the invoice single expense view has no IOU report, and the invoice report is actually a parent of its chat report. The whole logic revolves around that. The function itself performs checks such as isExpenseRequest so it is correct.

But I agree that there are sooo many checks that it needs a refractor and some utils functions and I am willing to do such as well as the optimization but I think we should focus to cover everything and do refractor as a last PR, same as we did with Better Expense Report View and it worked well.

What do you think?

Comment on lines +225 to +228
if (shouldUseInvoiceExpenseIcons) {
avatars = getIconsWithDefaults(invoiceReport);
} else if (shouldUseMappedAccountIDs) {
avatars = avatarsForAccountIDs;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the centralized place where these checks are made?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this hook is used inside a component that is used for every report or report action avatar in the app.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚧 @grgia has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@QichenZhu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JakubKorytko, I think the reviewers of #65740 will take care of this since it's a follow-up PR.

If it's time-sensitive or you'd like my input, I'm happy to help.

cc @grgia @c3024

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67993.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Android was skipped The build for iOS was skipped
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ https://67993.pr-testing.expensify.com
The build for Desktop was skipped Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@grgia grgia changed the title [Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace [CP Staging][Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace Aug 6, 2025
@grgia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

grgia commented Aug 6, 2025

@QichenZhu yes no need for review, I will be testing!

@grgia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

grgia commented Aug 6, 2025

image

Passes test

@grgia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

grgia commented Aug 6, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@grgia grgia merged commit 9f165e6 into Expensify:main Aug 6, 2025
18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 6, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…le-expense-no-subscript

[CP Staging][Avatars] Display subscript for single expenses & invoices in Workspace

(cherry picked from commit 9f165e6)

(cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Aug 6, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.89-19 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.89-21 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.90-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.90-11 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

const defaultDisplayName = getDisplayNameForParticipant({accountID, personalDetailsData: personalDetails}) ?? '';
const isAInvoiceReport = isInvoiceReport(iouReport ?? null);
const invoiceReport = [iouReport, chatReport, reportChatReport].find(isInvoiceReport);
const isNestedInInvoiceReport = !!invoiceReport;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #69343, we should add the check for the chat thread as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants