Skip to content

Add ability to cycle via reports v2#69221

Merged
mjasikowski merged 39 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feature/kuba_nowakowski/add_ability_to_cycle_via_reports_v2
Sep 23, 2025
Merged

Add ability to cycle via reports v2#69221
mjasikowski merged 39 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:feature/kuba_nowakowski/add_ability_to_cycle_via_reports_v2

Conversation

@sumo-slonik
Copy link
Contributor

@sumo-slonik sumo-slonik commented Aug 26, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

main one:
$ #65283

prev deploy blokers:
$ #69045
$ #69098
$ #69052
$ #69104
$ #69086

PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Enter a workspace that contains at least 51 reports.
  2. Perform a search that returns at least 51 reports using groupByReports.
  3. Open the first report from the search results.
  4. Click the "Next" arrow to navigate to the 50th report and ensure that it is possible to click through to report number 51.
  5. Return to the search results.
  6. Click on a report that appears beyond the first 20 reports and verify that the counter on the wide screen displays the correct number.
  7. Go to the Reports → Approve section.
  8. Click on any report and make sure the counter next to the navigation arrows is correct.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.13.16.43.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.13.26.46.mov
iOS: Native
iosNative.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.13.52.12.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.12.53.57.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.13.55.35.mov

@sumo-slonik sumo-slonik force-pushed the feature/kuba_nowakowski/add_ability_to_cycle_via_reports_v2 branch from 5c4d8c1 to 6b9a22d Compare August 26, 2025 09:07
…nto feature/kuba_nowakowski/add_ability_to_cycle_via_reports_v2

# Conflicts:
#	src/pages/home/sidebar/FloatingActionButtonAndPopover.tsx
@sumo-slonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

sumo-slonik commented Aug 27, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@SzymczakJ SzymczakJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left few minor comments. LGTM


const goToPrevReport = () => {
if (currentIndex === -1 || allReports.length === 0) {
return '';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return '';
return;

@sumo-slonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

We can probably start the second round of testing, since we managed to fix everything that we agreed should be delivered within this PR.

@mjasikowski
Copy link
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify pinging so we can merge this ASAP

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@JmillsExpensify Can you please take a look at this PR when you have a chance? Thanks

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Looking now! Sorry for the delay.

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Works really great! Thanks for keeping at this one.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@sumo-slonik can you please merge main to resolve the conflicts? Then we can merge cc @mjasikowski

@zfurtak
Copy link
Contributor

zfurtak commented Sep 23, 2025

Merged and ready 👍

cc: @dukenv0307 @mjasikowski

@mjasikowski
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome job everyone, merging!

@mjasikowski mjasikowski merged commit 10f58c4 into Expensify:main Sep 23, 2025
21 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mjasikowski in version: 9.2.17-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Bug found on staging: #71117

I'm not sure if it's critical enough to revert

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Another bug found from this: #71137

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.2.17-6 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

);

if (!!(isLoadingInitialReportActions && reportActions.length === 0 && !isOffline) || shouldWaitForTransactions) {
if (!!(isLoadingInitialReportActions && reportActions.length === 0 && !isOffline) || shouldWaitForTransactions || shouldWaitForReportSync) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #71268:
Regarding || shouldWaitForReportSync condition:
@sumo-slonik do we need to show skeleton while loading report from Onyx? This affects only android. I don't see skeleton in other platforms (maybe due to fast Onyx loading).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the absence of this condition was causing some GUI elements to flicker.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see any flickers

{isMoreContentShown && <View style={[styles.dFlex, styles.flexColumn, shouldAddGapToContents && styles.gap3, styles.pb3, styles.ph5]}>{moreContent}</View>}
{shouldDisplayNarrowVersion &&
(shouldShowSelectedTransactionsButton ? (
<View style={[styles.dFlex, styles.w100, styles.ph5]}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lack of spacing for the view component caused padding missing between next steps message and selected button for medium screen here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.