Skip to content

Conversation

@borys3kk
Copy link
Contributor

@borys3kk borys3kk commented Aug 27, 2025

Explanation of Change

Added isAuthTokenRequired to distanceEReceipt to resolve 403 error
Added display name for receiptPreview
Added explanation for eReceiptWithSizeCalculation props and a new one to handle displaying in receiptPreview

Fixed Issues

$ #69240
$ #69279
PROPOSAL:

Tests

WEB / DESKTOP

  1. Open reports tab
  2. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  3. Create a workspace.
  4. Go to Reports > Expenses.
  5. Open FAB > Create expense > Distance.
  6. Submit a distance expense to the workspace chat.
  7. Immediately hover over the receipt thumbnail on the expense row after submitting the distance expense.
  8. The distanceEReceipt should be displayed like the one below (no 403 error should be displayed in the map)
image

Android, IOS:
The e-Receipt preview is misaligned test steps:
Prerequisite: Have an account with eReceipt or follow below steps:
To get an expense with eReceipt:

  1. Open the HybridApp
  2. Enable company cards in the workspace
  3. Navigate to company cards in the workspace settings
  4. Tap add cards
  5. Choose United States -> Direct Feed -> American Express
  6. Complete the flow with credentials from "American Express - Work - Direct Feed" from 1Password
  7. Select the 2 available cards and complete the flow
  8. Tap Assign Card and complete assigning a card

Steps

  1. Open the HybridApp
  2. Go to Reports and find the expense with eReceipt
  3. Try to open the expense with the eReceipt
  4. Verify that eReceipt thumbnail in the preview is centered and zoomed in
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests
// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

e-Receipt preview is not misaligned anymore
image

Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-29.at.11.03.53.mov
Screen.Recording.2025-08-28.at.10.38.47.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@borys3kk borys3kk changed the title Expense - Map shows 403 error in the receipt when hovered Hover Preview - follow ups Aug 27, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #69337.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/69337/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/69337/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/69337/NewExpensify.dmg https://69337.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@borys3kk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested on adhoc and couldn't reproduce 403 error anymore
Earlier today I've tested if the eReceipt preview is still misaligned in App on Android device and it showed how it was supposed to so I think it was also resolved

Screen.Recording.2025-08-28.at.10.38.47.mov

@borys3kk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Additionaly the failing test in this PR is random
On the first try it failed but on the second it went through without problems :D

Screen.Recording.2025-08-28.at.10.44.25.mov

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@borys3kk ok thanks can you make this PR ready for a review so we can merge the fix?

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts Can you please test the PR for the 403 error?

@borys3kk borys3kk force-pushed the borys3kk-fix-403-error branch from 5a3163a to 2a74866 Compare August 29, 2025 08:56
@borys3kk borys3kk marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2025 09:08
@borys3kk borys3kk requested review from a team as code owners August 29, 2025 09:08
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny August 29, 2025 09:08
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 29, 2025

@mountiny Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team August 29, 2025 09:08
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Asked @allroundexperts for review

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Asked you a question here

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Unable to build android

Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-08-30.at.1.29.15.AM.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-08-30.at.1.22.46.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-30.at.12.47.18.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-08-30.at.12.41.02.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-08-30.at.12.44.53.AM.mov

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

allroundexperts commented Aug 29, 2025

One observation (not sure if its a blocker or not)

Distance receipt which has not loaded yet shows an empty modal.

Screenshot 2025-08-30 at 1 53 35 AM

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Single comment. Looks good otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'd think if you hover over an empty state thumbnail we don't open the popover. CC: @Expensify/design for vis too.

image

@borys3kk
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd just like to point out that when there's no thumbnail, it means there's no preview shown on hover
In the case of distanceEReceipt, an empty hover briefly appears just before the eReceipt is generated

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I'd think if you hover over an empty state thumbnail we don't open the popover.

Agree 👍

@JmillsExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Also agree on no popover on an empty state.

@borys3kk
Copy link
Contributor Author

borys3kk commented Sep 1, 2025

To clear things up
When hovering over expense without any thumbnail / image no preview is shown
On my dev env when hovering over newly created distance request the eReceipt with map 'loading' state is shown and after map loads in it shows as it's supposed to do

Screen.Recording.2025-09-01.at.14.14.22.mov

You can see it on the recording above

Does it look different in your dev env @allroundexperts
If so can you provide repro steps?

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Interesting yeah, it'll be good to get repro steps from @allroundexperts, because the blank popover doesn't look great.

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my understanding this should fix more things than the empty preview issue that is being discussed and other than @allroundexperts we could not reproduce so I will move this PR ahead but @allroundexperts please share your reproduction steps if you can still reproduce the blank preview issue

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 06cc002 into Expensify:main Sep 1, 2025
28 of 32 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 1, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@mountiny mountiny changed the title Hover Preview - follow ups [CP Staging] Hover Preview - follow ups Sep 2, 2025
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
…-error

Hover Preview - follow ups

(cherry picked from commit 06cc002)

(cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Sep 2, 2025
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.0-4 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.0-4 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.0-5 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 failure ❌
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2025

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.1-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 2, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.0-5 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 5, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.1-20 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants