Skip to content

[CP Staging] Fix DB issues of Merge Expenses#70334

Merged
francoisl merged 15 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
hoangzinh:fix/70329-merging-expenses-offline
Sep 11, 2025
Merged

[CP Staging] Fix DB issues of Merge Expenses#70334
francoisl merged 15 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
hoangzinh:fix/70329-merging-expenses-offline

Conversation

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hoangzinh hoangzinh commented Sep 11, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #70329
$ #70331
$ #70336
$ #70338
$ #70356
$ #70352
$ #70345
$ #70412
$ #70351

PROPOSAL:

Tests

Same as QA

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Case 1: Disable merge IOU expenses

  1. Go to 1:1 DM
  2. Submit any expense
  3. Open the expense report
  4. Tap on "More" button
  5. Verify that there is no "Merge" option

Case 2: Fix After merging expenses offline, the original amount is still retained

  1. Go to workspace chat.
  2. Create two expenses with different amount in the workspace chat.
  3. Open the expense report.
  4. Go offline.
  5. Select the second expense via checkbox.
  6. Click dropdown button > Merge.
  7. Select the other expense > Continue.
  8. Select all details from the other expense (the expense selected in Step 6).
  9. Click Continue.
  10. Click Merge expenses.
  11. Verify that the amount will optimistically update to the selected amount.

Case 3: Fix "It´s not here" page displayed when merging expenses from different WS on "Reports"

Prerequisite: Account has at least two workspaces available.

  1. Open the staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Open any workspace chat.
  3. Create a manual expense.
  4. Navigate to another workspace chat.
  5. Create a different manual expense.
  6. Navigate to "Reports"
  7. Open the last created expense.
  8. Tap on "More" and select "Merge"
  9. Select the first created expense to merge with.
  10. Tap on "Continue"
  11. Select the amount and report of the first created expense.
  12. Tap on "Continue" and confirm the expenses merge.
  13. Verify App navigates to merged expense

Case 4: Fix "Moved this expense to" without report number seen after merging track expense.

Prerequisite: Account has at least two workspaces.
Prerequisite 2: Account has a Self DM.

  1. Open the staging.new.expensify.com website.
  2. Open any workspace chat.
  3. Create a manual expense.
  4. Return to "Inbox"
  5. Create a new manual expense and submit it to Self DM.
  6. Tap on "Submit to someone" below the expense.
  7. Submit the expense to a workspace different than the used on step 2.
  8. Navigate to workspace where track expense was submitted.
  9. Open the report.
  10. Tap on "More" and select "Merge"
  11. Select the expense created on step 3 and tap on "Continue"
  12. Select all the details of expense created on step 3 and finish the merging process.
  13. When redirected to chat, navigate to the report of the remaining expense.
  14. Verify that "Moved this expense to" message is displayed correctly

Case 5: Fix Select details page is blank when merging with card transaction

Precondition:

  • Workspace has imported card transactions.
  • Create an expense that shares the same amount, merchant, description, category and date as the card transaction on the same report.
  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to workspace chat.
  3. Open the expense report that has card and cash transactions from above.
  4. Open the CASH expense.
  5. Click More > Merge.
  6. Select the CARD transaction (same details as the cash expense).
  7. Click Continue.
  8. Verify App navigates to confirmation page

Case 6: Fix Merge expense - Second line of sentence is cut off when device font size is minimum

Precondition:

  1. Device font size is the smallest.
  2. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  3. Go to workspace chat.
  4. Create two expenses with workspace chat. At least one of them has a long merchant.
  5. Open expense report.
  6. Long tap on the expense with long merchant > Select.
  7. Tap dropdown button > Merge.
  8. Verify The second line of sentence under Merge expenses header will not be cut off.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.19.28.06.android.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.19.38.34.android.chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.20.00.24.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.19.47.20.ios.safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.08.54.33.web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.18.06.08.desktop.mov

@hoangzinh hoangzinh changed the title Fix amount is not optimictic updated when merge offline Fix DB issues of Merge Expenses Sep 11, 2025
@hoangzinh hoangzinh marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2025 12:45
@hoangzinh hoangzinh requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2025 12:45
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from thienlnam and removed request for a team September 11, 2025 12:45
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2025

@thienlnam Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @thienlnam. I think @youssef-lr will handle this PR

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cc @dominictb

@youssef-lr youssef-lr requested review from youssef-lr and removed request for thienlnam September 11, 2025 14:28
@dominictb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dominictb commented Sep 11, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-09-11.at.23.19.33-compressed.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Untitled.mov
Untitled.2.mov
MacOS: Desktop

setIsMergingExpenses(true);
mergeTransactionRequest(transactionID, mergeTransaction, targetTransaction, sourceTransaction);
Navigation.dismissModal();
Navigation.dismissModalWithReport({reportID});
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this fix the navigation after merge that I mentioned here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think yes, it does

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dominictb dominictb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can merge once the above updates are resolved 👍

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from thienlnam September 11, 2025 16:36
@hoangzinh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

On it.

@srikarparsi srikarparsi self-requested a review September 11, 2025 19:31
@srikarparsi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Testing that this fixed #70412

@hoangzinh hoangzinh dismissed stale reviews from francoisl and thienlnam via f1950f5 September 11, 2025 19:38
@francoisl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

All right, let's do it!

@francoisl francoisl merged commit 3c79df2 into Expensify:main Sep 11, 2025
25 checks passed
@francoisl francoisl changed the title Fix DB issues of Merge Expenses [CP Staging] Fix DB issues of Merge Expenses Sep 11, 2025
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
…ffline

(cherry picked from commit 3c79df2)

(cherry-picked to staging by francoisl)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Sep 11, 2025
@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.2.12-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.2.12-4 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.2.13-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.13-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Comment on lines +262 to +264
[iouActionOfSourceTransaction.reportActionID]: {
pendingAction: null,
},
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also need to clear the pendingAction in success data to fix this #71045

Navigation.dismissModal();
}
}, [targetTransaction, mergeTransaction, sourceTransaction, transactionID, targetTransactionThreadReportID]);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we didn't handle the navigation properly for reports pages. It caused #73057

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

9 participants