Skip to content

Moving workspace currency to a separate page#70575

Merged
aldo-expensify merged 19 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
abzokhattab:workspace-currency-fix
Oct 6, 2025
Merged

Moving workspace currency to a separate page#70575
aldo-expensify merged 19 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
abzokhattab:workspace-currency-fix

Conversation

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor

@abzokhattab abzokhattab commented Sep 15, 2025

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #69737
PROPOSAL: #69737 (comment)

Tests

  1. in the workspace list page click on 'New workspace'
  2. Validate that currency field shows default currency with symbol (e.g., "USD - $")
  3. Click on the currency field
  4. Select a different currency (e.g., EUR, GBP, CAD)
  5. Validate that you navigate back and currency field shows the newly selected currency with symbol (e.g., "EUR - €")
  6. Click on the currency field again
  7. Search for invalid currency and press enter
  8. Validate that nothing happens and workspace is not created
  9. Search for a valid one
  10. Press enter on the keyboard
  11. Validate that workspace is created successfully with the selected currency

Offline tests

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.17.23.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.18.45.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.17.23.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.18.45.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.16.25.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-09-17.at.20.23.34.mov

@abzokhattab abzokhattab requested a review from a team as a code owner September 15, 2025 14:58
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from truph01 and removed request for a team September 15, 2025 14:58
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 15, 2025

@truph01 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@abzokhattab abzokhattab marked this pull request as draft September 15, 2025 15:14
@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

@truph01

I kept the backTo parameter because the background page in the workspace confirmation and currency selection pages is determined based on backTo. Since the “Create Workspace” RHP can be triggered in multiple scenarios, I believe removing backTo could introduce breaking changes. It also doesn’t seem fully related to the current issue.

We could handle cleaning this up in a separate task by removing backTo from the “Create Workspace” flow entirely. Let me know what you think.

@abzokhattab abzokhattab marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 17:53
@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Sep 22, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.45.04.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.37.59.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.36.16.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.37.09.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.32.24.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-10-06.at.13.35.36.mov

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Sep 23, 2025

@abzokhattab Could you help merge main?

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

sure!! done

const [workspaceNameFirstCharacter, setWorkspaceNameFirstCharacter] = useState(defaultWorkspaceName ?? '');

const userCurrency = allPersonalDetails?.[session?.accountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID]?.localCurrencyCode ?? CONST.CURRENCY.USD;
const userCurrency = draftValues?.currency ?? allPersonalDetails?.[session?.accountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID]?.localCurrencyCode ?? CONST.CURRENCY.USD;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems we currently lack logic to clear draftValues?.currency when this page is closed. As a result, if a user selects a currency, closes the page, and then reopens it, the previously selected currency is incorrectly retained as the default.

However, based on the behavior observed in staging, each time the page is opened, the default currency should be determined using:


allPersonalDetails?.[session?.accountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID]?.localCurrencyCode ?? CONST.CURRENCY.USD;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added this use effect to clear the draft value on closing the page

    useEffect(() => {
        return () => {
            clearDraftValues(ONYXKEYS.FORMS.WORKSPACE_CONFIRMATION_FORM);
        };
    }, []);

just like how we are doing in other pages ... what do u think ?

title={currency}
title={shouldShowCurrencySymbol && currency ? `${currency} - ${getCurrencySymbol(currency)}` : currency}
ref={ref}
descriptionTextStyle={currencyTitleDescStyle}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like it will break the description's style by comparing with the staging behavior.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch ... i modified the descritpion style to check if the shouldShowCurrencySymbol is false

https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/70575/files#diff-918190f9217d561422ca355cc5ee85de4f9dba8e69b672566b197b2d3d74200cR62

what do u think.. this ensures backward combilitability and works well for the new component as well

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this resolved?

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Sep 25, 2025

Bug 1 (I am not sure whether it is bug, so we need to ask design/internal team to confirm):

  1. Open /workspace/confirmation/currency?backTo=workspaces screen.
  2. Refresh the page.
  3. Observe that user is still in /workspace/confirmation/currency?backTo=workspaces screen. But comparing with staging behavior, user is navigated to Confirm Workspace screen.

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Sep 25, 2025

@abzokhattab I left a few comments

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2025

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bug 1 (I am not sure whether it is bug, so we need to ask design/internal team to confirm):

is that considered a bug? i would expect that to the intended behavior now since we are moving the currency to a new seperate route. we need to confirm that behaviour

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

@abzokhattab I left a few comments

thanks for the review .. i covered ur comments .. please take another look when u have time

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Sep 29, 2025

is that considered a bug? i would expect that to the intended behavior now since we are moving the currency to a new seperate route. we need to confirm that behaviour

@abzokhattab Please help ask internal team to confirm it. From my side, I also think it isn't a bug

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @aldo-expensify, we need your help regarding the following new behavior. Can you confirm if this is expected?

  1. User clicks Create Workspace.
  2. Click the Currency menu option.
  3. Select a currency.
  4. Open the currency list again.
  5. Refresh the page.
  6. After the refresh, the page remains on the currency list, and the option selected in step 3 is still selected.

Refer to #70575 (comment) and #70575 (comment)

Screen.Recording.2025-09-30.at.00.42.20.mov

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Oct 1, 2025

  1. After the refresh, the page remains on the currency list, and the option selected in step 3 is still selected.

@abzokhattab Regarding the part where "the option selected in step 3 is still selected"—I believe this is a bug. It should match the current behavior on staging. Let's update the PR to address this.

As for "After the refresh, the page remains on the currency list," I think that's expected behavior now, since we're using the currency picker as a full screen instead of a modal.

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

@truph01 I know it’s not the same as staging, but since we moved currency selection to a separate page, it’s now possible to persist the user’s choice—just like we do in other flows, such as the Merchant field in Create Expense (attached a video).

so previously, we couldn’t keep the currency modal open because the currency URL was the same as Create Workspace, so we couldn’t tell them apart. Now that they’re separate, why wouldn’t we keep the selected option?

Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.15.04.02.mov

cc @aldo-expensify

@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

@truph01 I know it’s not the same as staging, but since we moved currency selection to a separate page, it’s now possible to persist the user’s choice—just like we do in other flows, such as the Merchant field in Create Expense (attached a video).

I other fields edited in their own pages retain the edited value after refresh, I think it is fine to do it here and be consistent with that (even if staging is behaving differently right now)

so previously, we couldn’t keep the currency modal open because the currency URL was the same as Create Workspace, so we couldn’t tell them apart. Now that they’re separate, why wouldn’t we keep the selected option?

How it works in your PR makes sense to me, I would keep it like that if it is consistent with other fields with separate pages.

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

what do u think @truph01

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Oct 3, 2025

@abzokhattab Based on this comment, the current behavior in our PR looks good

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Oct 3, 2025

@abzokhattab Could you merge main again?

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

truph01 commented Oct 3, 2025

@abzokhattab We have regression in workspace creation flow. The test step mentioned in this PR

Screen.Recording.2025-10-03.at.17.14.14.mov

@abzokhattab
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good point @truph01 ... i have fixed this bug here is the behaviour after the fix

Screen.Recording.2025-10-04.at.14.02.10.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from aldo-expensify October 6, 2025 08:54
@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify merged commit 83b1cd4 into Expensify:main Oct 6, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/aldo-expensify in version: 9.2.27-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.2.27-6 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@jayeshmangwani
Copy link
Contributor

@truph01 @abzokhattab Coming from this issue #73396 , this PR adds a new route for workspace currency selection. However, it introduced a problem in the WorkspaceConfirmationForm, which prevented navigation from the book-travel -> workspace-upgrade page flow to the workspace currency selection. We fixed it here #74035 by adding the new route for the confirmation instead of using the modal. More context here: #73396 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants