Skip to content

Conversation

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor

@jmusial jmusial commented Sep 17, 2025

Explanation of Change

This PR rewrites Expensify card details preview verification to use navigation instead of modals.

Fixed Issues

$ #69171

PROPOSAL:
n/a

Tests

Assumption: The account has a workspace with at least one Expensify virtual card created

  1. Go to Settings -> Wallet
  2. Press on one of the assigned cards
  3. Press on Reveal details
  4. Type in the code
  5. See the card details
  6. Refresh hides the details
  7. Urls do not have backTo & forwardTo at any point of the flow

Offline tests

n/a

QA Steps

Same as tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
0046.android.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
0046.android.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
0046.ios.native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
0046.ios.safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
0046.desktop.chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
0046.desktop.native.mov

@jmusial jmusial marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 13:03
@jmusial jmusial requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2025 13:03
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ishpaul777 and removed request for a team September 17, 2025 13:03
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 17, 2025

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

Assumption: The account has a workspace with at least one Expensify virtual card created

hey @jmusial do you know how can i add a EXFY card in test account? if i try to enable wallet with fake plaid credentials it still asks me identity verfiication

Screen.Recording.2025-09-18.at.4.05.32.AM.mov

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 18, 2025

@ishpaul777 are you using a staging server for backend ?

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

yes i am using staging server @jmusial 🤔

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 18, 2025

yes i am using staging server @jmusial 🤔

And I see your data seems ok for the test flow. Not sure I can help here, sorry :(

For me when it was asking me for verification it was either I put one of the Alberta's data wrong or not using staging server from the very beginning of the flow

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

i am adding data from these steps https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1711049892429129?thread_ts=1711049879.962529&cid=C01GTK53T8Q, can you check if its correct?

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 18, 2025

i am adding data from these steps https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1711049892429129?thread_ts=1711049879.962529&cid=C01GTK53T8Q, can you check if its correct?

I'm using same ones :(

@ishpaul777

This comment was marked as resolved.

import React, {createContext, useMemo, useState} from 'react';
import type {ExpensifyCardDetails} from '@src/types/onyx/Card';

type ExpensifyCardContextProviderPropsProps = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
type ExpensifyCardContextProviderPropsProps = {
type ExpensifyCardContextValue = {

FullScreenLoaderContextProvider,
ModalProvider,
SidePanelContextProvider,
ExpensifyCardContextProvider,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previously, the card details were stored in the component state, so when the RHP was closed the user had to re-enter the magic code. Now, the details are stored in the app context, meaning they persist until a hard refresh. Are we okay with this change in behavior?

Would love your input here, @mountiny.

Screen.Recording.2025-09-19.at.2.07.29.AM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gentle bump @mountiny

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the RHP is closed and reopened, is new code always sent?

If yes we should reset it

if no, if you start a different flow that will need the magic code, that reset the form, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Common

  1. Go to Settings -> Wallet
  2. Press on one of the assigned cards
  3. Press on Reveal details
  4. Type in the code
  5. See the card A details
  6. Close the Card details RHP
  7. Click on the card A details

Old behaviour:
8. You need to go through 3 - 5 to see the card details (card details stored in state)

New behaviour:
8. You can see the card details (stored in context)

Common:
9. Close the Card details RHP
10. Click on card Bdetails
11. You need to go through 3 - 5 to see the card details

I'll reset it on closing to align with old behaviour

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ooooh you mean card details like PAN and pic, ok I do think that was in state only on purpose. Why do you need to add it to the context to share it across screens? I believe we want this data to be as safe and secure as possible so the previous approach was safer imho

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2025

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Sep 26, 2025

@ishpaul777 resetting the state of Card details (just web video bc I maxed out on magic codes for today :( )

Screen.Recording.2025-09-26.at.17.37.16.mov

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

will rereview today!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 Let me know when done!

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Sep 30, 2025

sorry for delay here i'll finish this in 1 hour

edit: have to leave early for the day this but this is on top on list when i start tomorrow

Comment on lines +117 to +120
// This resets card details when we exit the page.
useBeforeRemove(() => {
setCardsDetails((oldCardDetails) => ({...oldCardDetails, [cardID]: null}));
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just want to confirm, are you confident that sensitive card data would not persist in the app even after the pages are exited? Basically, that was the benefit of using the state here, when the component unmounted, this data was cleared. I think we want to ensure the same level of security here

Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 Oct 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my testing it seems to work fine for all the cases, going back using on screen <, device back button and dismissing rhp on click out side RHP, user has to reenter the code to reveal the details

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Oct 1, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.4.34.22.AM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.5.30.29.PM.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.3.15.34.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.3.28.19.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.2.58.44.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-10-01.at.5.37.22.PM.mov

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@jmusial please fix conflicts

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Oct 2, 2025

@ishpaul777 bump

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

oh sorry actually i was waiting till your this comment is resolved by @jmusial

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Oct 2, 2025

I'll still retest since main is merged and approve this in few mins

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny October 2, 2025 19:08

/**
* Hook to display revealed expensify card data and pass it between screens.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 9b7fa25 into Expensify:main Oct 2, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 2, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 3, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.2.23-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@izarutskaya
Copy link

Hi @jmusial Card details get hidden after going back & selecting same virtual card
Repro in prod

Bug6964207_1759527731164.03.10.2025_17.20.11_REC6.mp4

Do we need create new GH ticket for this?

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Oct 6, 2025

@izarutskaya not sure I understand. You pasted a video from staging ? Also I checked and staging & prod behave the same rn

@izarutskaya
Copy link

@jmusial Yes, it's staging
So it's not a bug, right?

@jmusial
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmusial commented Oct 6, 2025

yeah, 100% expected & consistent with current behaviour
#70736 (comment)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.2.23-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants