Skip to content

fix: save the scroll position in workspace list screen#77313

Merged
francoisl merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
truph01:fix/76271
Jan 7, 2026
Merged

fix: save the scroll position in workspace list screen#77313
francoisl merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
truph01:fix/76271

Conversation

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor

@truph01 truph01 commented Dec 11, 2025

Explanation of Change

Implement scroll position preservation for WorkspacesListPage using the existing ScrollOffsetContext.

Fixed Issues

$ #76271
PROPOSAL: #76271 (comment)

Tests

  1. Log in to the app
  2. Tap on the Workspace tab
  3. Scroll down to the bottom
  4. Tap on any workspace
  5. Swipe back
  6. Verify: The app retains the previous scroll position after swiping back.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-11.at.14.22.41.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2025-12-11.at.11.35.05.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2025-12-11.at.14.18.06.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-11.at.11.30.15.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-12-11.at.11.24.41.mov

@truph01 truph01 marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2025 04:39
@truph01 truph01 requested review from a team as code owners December 11, 2025 04:39
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and rojiphil and removed request for a team December 11, 2025 04:39
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/ScrollOffsetContextProvider.tsx 50.00% <100.00%> (+3.84%) ⬆️
src/pages/workspace/WorkspacesListPage.tsx 76.87% <80.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

@truph01 Thanks for the PR.

The android version does not work fine for me.
Can you please check if it works with more number of workspaces?

77313-android-hybrid-issue-001.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change is fine from a product perspective

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor Author

truph01 commented Dec 16, 2025

@rojiphil In your video, how many workspaces do you have?

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

In your video, how many workspaces do you have?

@truph01 Around 33 workspaces.

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor Author

truph01 commented Dec 22, 2025

On it now

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor Author

truph01 commented Dec 23, 2025

@rojiphil I've updated the PR. Here's the result when testing with an account that has more than 35 workspaces:

Screen.Recording.2025-12-24.at.03.26.01.mov

@truph01
Copy link
Contributor Author

truph01 commented Dec 30, 2025

@rojiphil Please help re-review this PR once you have a chance.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
77313-android-hybrid-001.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
77313-mweb-chrome-001.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
77313-ios-hybrid-001.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
77313-mweb-safari-001.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
77313-web-chrome-001.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@rojiphil rojiphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @truph01 for the updates.

@francoisl Changes LGTM and works well too.
Over to you. Thanks.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from francoisl December 30, 2025 16:52
keyboardShouldPersistTaps="handled"
contentContainerStyle={styles.pb20}
onScroll={onScroll}
initialNumToRender={data.length}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this going to cause the list to render all items on mount? If so, it might have a performance impact, can we add a comment that explains why it's needed?
Also is there no way to make this dynamic based on the window height or something?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also is there no way to make this dynamic based on the window height or something?

Yeah… like this approach although the data may not be huge enough to worry about performance issues as we are dealing about workspaces
@truph01 Can we use window height like how we use here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@truph01 Can we use window height like how we use here?

@rojiphil The initialNumToRender in the linked example

const initialNumToRender = useMemo((): number | undefined => {
is used to calculate an ideal number of report actions to render on the initial mount, purely to ensure the content fills the screen.

In my PR, initialNumToRender serves a different purpose: it’s required to handle scrolling correctly on the first render. Because of that, the number of items to render initially cannot be derived in the same way as in the referenced example.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok fair. Can we still add a comment that explains why it's needed though please? Otherwise someone might try to remove it thinking it's unnecessary, and cause a regression.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a comment. @rojiphil @francoisl, please help check.

@francoisl francoisl merged commit 9c9d631 into Expensify:main Jan 7, 2026
39 of 40 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 7, 2026

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 8, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.2.96-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.96-6 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.96-6 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 9.2.96-6 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

TMisiukiewicz added a commit to callstack-internal/Expensify-App that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
This reverts commit 9c9d631, reversing
changes made to 6d0b574.
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@truph01 @rojiphil @francoisl fyi we are reverting this PR because https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C05LX9D6E07/p1770725362096819?thread_ts=1770670428.191389&cid=C05LX9D6E07

I think that this feature is not work the overhead it brings for customer with many workspaces

mountiny added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
…-position-workspace-list

[NoQA] Revert "Merge pull request #77313 from truph01/fix/76271"
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
…-position-workspace-list

[NoQA] Revert "Merge pull request #77313 from truph01/fix/76271"

(cherry picked from commit e79a8eb)

(cherry-picked to staging by mountiny)
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.3.17-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

Hi @truph01, QA team failed this PR on Web and Android with the original issue

1770794630964.77313A.mp4
1770794630966.77313w.mp4

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@IuliiaHerets this was reverted, so that is expected

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Checked it off some mistake in the checklist

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.3.17-9 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants