Conversation
|
The failing Unsafe mutable references job is a false positive for this - this PR does use local composite actions but because it checks out other repos it prefixes it with ./App/.github/actions/composite/ EDIT: Well actually seems like it was there for a reason since it won't work when checked out like this hahah |
melvin-bot
bot
requested review from
MonilBhavsar
and removed request for
a team
|
@MonilBhavsar Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6602077335
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
…ve to leak by using it as the root and checking out workspaces inside it
|
Hold on, I was realizing we don't need to pull the BE repos and can reduce that risk vector since you can kind of tell whether it was a BE problem just from the front end |
thienlnam
changed the title
thienlnam
changed the title
|
Okay ready to review cc @AndrewGable |
cead22
left a comment
cead22
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💚 ignore my suggestions and if they aren't good
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alvarez <carlos@expensify.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos Alvarez <carlos@expensify.com>
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*),Bash(gh issue edit:*),Bash(gh issue comment:*),Bash(gh issue list:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr list:*),Bash(gh api:*),Bash(git log:*),Bash(git show:*),Bash(git blame:*),Glob,Grep,Read | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we tighten up Bash(gh issue edit:*) to just allow --remove-label?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about:
| allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*),Bash(gh issue edit:*),Bash(gh issue comment:*),Bash(gh issue list:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr list:*),Bash(gh api:*),Bash(git log:*),Bash(git show:*),Bash(git blame:*),Glob,Grep,Read | |
| allowed-tools: Bash(gh issue view:*),Bash(gh issue edit:* --remove-label DeployBlocker),Bash(gh issue edit:* --remove-label DeployBlockerCash),Bash(gh issue comment:*),Bash(gh issue list:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(gh pr list:*),Bash(gh api:*),Bash(git log:*),Bash(git show:*),Bash(git blame:*),Glob,Grep,Read |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah let's test this, if it doesn't work we can add the wrapper script like with the inline comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
AFAIK wildcard (*) works only as a suffix, but lets give it a shot. Otherwise, we can go with @thienlnam suggestion 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah looks like it failed, so will go with the wrapper
"permission_denials": [
{
"tool_name": "Bash",
"tool_use_id": "toolu_014iGBzyGnNCqZ9grnwZKkpA",
"tool_input": {
"command": "gh pr diff 77945 --repo Expensify/App | grep -A 50 -B 5 "PopoverReportActionContextMenu.tsx" | head -150",
"description": "Get diff for PopoverReportActionContextMenu"
}
},
{
"tool_name": "Bash",
"tool_use_id": "toolu_01Dcf7KYADA4tCUUj9c7iQS1",
"tool_input": {
"command": "gh pr diff 77945 --repo Expensify/App > /tmp/pr_diff.txt && head -300 /tmp/pr_diff.txt",
"description": "Download PR diff to file"
}
},
{
"tool_name": "Bash",
"tool_use_id": "toolu_01QUBvL5geGe9gjy6LCj2skp",
"tool_input": {
"command": "gh pr diff 77945 --repo Expensify/App > /home/runner/work/App/App/pr_diff.txt && wc -l /home/runner/work/App/App/pr_diff.txt",
"description": "Save PR diff to working directory"
}
},
{
"tool_name": "Bash",
"tool_use_id": "toolu_01KJ4WBvLAXZCHsJLwL9oFg8",
"tool_input": {
"command": "gh issue edit 79129 --remove-label "DeployBlocker" --repo Expensify/App",
"description": "Remove DeployBlocker label for frontend bug"
}
}
]
}
AndrewGable
left a comment
AndrewGable
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.97-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.99-0 🚀
|
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.2.99-8 🚀
|
5 participants
Explanation of Change
Adds a new GitHub Actions workflow that uses Claude code to investigate deploy blocker issues and link to the causing PR and update labels based on whether this was a FE / BE bug
cc @cead22
Fixed Issues
$
PROPOSAL:
Tests
Requires a bunch of tokens and env specific setup so I will test this manually when it is merged
Offline tests
QA Steps
NO QA
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari