fix: Refetch expanded group data on toggle to prevent stale transactions after date edits

[abbasifaizan70]

Explanation of Change

This PR fixed the refetch expanded group data on toggle to prevent stale transactions after date edits

Fixed Issues

$ #79160
PROPOSAL:

Tests

1. Open the Expensify app.
2. Open any workspace chat.
3. Create two manual expenses. (One with date from last month and the second one with date from this month).
4. Navigate to "Reports" > "Top Spenders"
5. Expand the results.
6. Note that only the expense with date from last month is visible on results.
7. Navigate to chat again.
8. Open expenses report and navigate to the expense with date from this month.
9. Tap on the date field and edit the expense date to any date from last month.
10. Return to "Reports" > "Top Spenders"
11. Expand the results.
12. Note that total amount was correctly updated, but the edited expense preview is not visible after expanding.
13. After editing the date of an expense to any date from last month, preview should automatically appear on "Top Spenders" section.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

same as tests.

QA Steps

same as tests.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-01-09.at.8.11.18.PM.mov

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...stWithSections/Search/TransactionGroupListItem.tsx	65.44% <90.90%> (+3.50%)	⬆️
... and 74 files with indirect coverage changes

[melvin-bot]

@mananjadhav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f1c4b8602e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[puneetlath]

@mananjadhav can you review this please.

[mananjadhav]

Reviewing this along with this #79168

[mananjadhav]

Here's what I am thinking before I dive into the solution. The changes we made for Top spenders were similar to the other filters, yet the bug is reported only for Top spenders. Now I understand this might be different for Submit/Approved etc. but Unapproved Cash also seems to be a group by filter. So it should be an issue with that too. I am just verifying all of these.

Additionally, I think if we resolve stale data issue, then #79168 should get resolved too as we would get latest data.

[abbasifaizan70]

Here's what I am thinking before I dive into the solution. The changes we made for Top spenders were similar to the other filters, yet the bug is reported only for Top spenders. Now I understand this might be different for Submit/Approved etc. but Unapproved Cash also seems to be a group by filter. So it should be an issue with that too. I am just verifying all of these.

Additionally, I think if we resolve stale data issue, then #79168 should get resolved too as we would get latest data.

Yes, I agree with you. The stale issue is an old one and was reported only for top spenders. Once this issue is resolved, both this issue and the one you tagged will be automatically resolved as well. These issues were not caused by my top-spender ticket implementation.

Therefore, I think we can treat them as completely separate and close this one. #78309

[mananjadhav]

Started reviewing the PR. And I am able to reproduce the same issue with Unapproved Cash section as well.

[abbasifaizan70]

@abbasifaizan70 have you addressed @huult's questions? Can we get this final approved and merged today?

Looking into @huult comments

[trjExpensify]

Thank you.

[abbasifaizan70]

@huult yes on main it reproducebale.

Screen.Recording.2026-01-30.at.1.27.57.AM.mov

[trjExpensify]

@huult what's the ETA here on completing the review?

[huult]

@trjExpensify Yes, I’ll check it within the next hour and may complete it within 2 hours

[trjExpensify]

Thanks! If we can get this approved and merged before the deploy cut-off in a couple of hours, that would be good.

[huult]

LGTM

[lakchote]

LGTM

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.3.11-16 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

[nlemma]

@abbasifaizan70 while offline top spenders are not shown when expanding it, is this expected?

[abbasifaizan70]

@abbasifaizan70, while offline top spenders are not shown when expanding it, is this expected?

Yes, we don't use state management for them; instead,d we are calling the API, so while offline, it's not possible to get updated data from APIs.

@mananjadhav @puneetlath

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.3.12-1 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌