Mobile search-router is a RHP on native v2#79486
Merged
mountiny merged 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom Jan 27, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.
|
Contributor
Author
|
Lint fail seems unrelated. |
melvin-bot
bot
requested review from
parasharrajat and
trjExpensify
and removed request for
a team
|
@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
| * @param state - The root navigation state from useRootNavigationState hook | ||
| * @returns Object containing contextualReportID (the report ID if on a report screen) and isSearchRouterScreen (whether SearchRouter is focused) | ||
| */ | ||
| function getContextualReportData(state: NavigationState | undefined): ContextualReportData { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we use depend on findLastAccessedReport?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking about it but as far as I understand how it works it may produce false positives / or make logic more complex.
- If we use just
findLastAccessedReport- there is no guarantee that we came to search directly from a report -> false positives. - If we use it in combination with current logic adding more complexity, in the point we know that we want to show the additional content we have report id in
paramsalready
based on that I chose current solution
Comment on lines
+38
to
+39
| const isSearchRouterScreen = focusedRoute?.name === SCREENS.RIGHT_MODAL.SEARCH_ROUTER; | ||
| if (focusedRoute?.name === SCREENS.RIGHT_MODAL.SEARCH_ROUTER) { |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both are same. we can reuse the variable.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fb7a93c537
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Contributor
|
PR doesn’t need product input as a refactor PR. Unassigning and unsubscribing myself. |
Member
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeScreenRecording_01-11-2026.23-40-58_1.mov🔲 iOS / Safari12.01.2026_00.01.00_REC.mp4🔲 MacOS / Chrome11.01.2026_23.59.19_REC.mp4🔲 Android / Chrome12.01.2026_00.10.42_REC.mp4🔲 Android / native12.01.2026_00.06.17_REC.mp4 |
Member
|
conflicts. |
Member
|
Tested #79409 and search looks good to me. |
parasharrajat
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2026
Member
parasharrajat
left a comment
parasharrajat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issuessection above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Testssection - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA stepssection - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReportand notonIconClick). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copylabel for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar, I verified the components usingAvatarhave been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */ - The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
thisproperly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}the methodthis.submitshould be bound tothisin the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
thisare necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);ifthis.submitis never passed to a component event handler likeonClick) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
- If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added
Designlabel so the design team can review the changes.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
Member
|
Bump @mountiny |
Contributor
|
Unfortunately we have conflicts, please ping me in slack once resolved |
Member
|
@jmusial Conflicts... |
Contributor
|
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
70 tasks
Contributor
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.10-0 🚀
|
7 tasks
Contributor
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.10-6 🚀
|
7 tasks
| // eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-syntax -- Legacy route generation | ||
| WORKSPACES_LIST: {route: 'workspaces', getRoute: (backTo?: string) => getUrlWithBackToParam('workspaces', backTo)}, | ||
|
|
||
| SEARCH_ROUTER: 'search-router', |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Routing was not correct in this PR, which caused #80670
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explanation of Change
This PR rewrites
SearchRouterModalto use navigation RHP instead of modal for android and ios native.Fixed Issues
$ #53493
$ #79409
PROPOSAL:
Tests
Perform tests for each of the pages
/home)/settings/profile)/workspaces)/r/:reportID)/search/r/:reportID)Tests:
Basic navigation 1
SearchButton-> Search router modal opensBasic navigation 2
SearchButton-> Search router modal opensAdvanced navigation 1
SearchButton-> Search router modal opensAdvanced navigation 2
SearchButton-> Search router modal opensTest coming from revert
Offline tests
QA Steps
Same as tests
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issuessection aboveTestssectionOffline stepssectionQA stepssectioncanBeMissingparam foruseOnyxtoggleReportand notonIconClick)src/languages/*files and using the translation methodSTYLE.md) were followedAvatar, I verified the components usingAvatarare working as expected)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))npm run compress-svg)Avataris modified, I verified thatAvataris working as expected in all cases)Designlabel and/or tagged@Expensify/designso the design team can review the changes.ScrollViewcomponent to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.mainbranch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTeststeps.Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
0080.android.native.mov
0086.android.native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
See: MacOS: Chrome / Safari
iOS: Native
0080.ios.native.mov
0086.ios.native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
See: MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
This PR does not change web implementation. Attaching small screen from chrome desktop as a sanity check & reference point.
On large screens the modal remains a POPOVER.
0080.chrome.desktop.mov