Skip to content

Support displaying a pending state in the report status for To-Do search results when an action is pending#79736

Merged
robertjchen merged 15 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
tsa321:fixSearchActionFilter
Jan 29, 2026
Merged

Support displaying a pending state in the report status for To-Do search results when an action is pending#79736
robertjchen merged 15 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
tsa321:fixSearchActionFilter

Conversation

@tsa321
Copy link
Contributor

@tsa321 tsa321 commented Jan 16, 2026

Explanation of Change

This PR displays a lower-opacity (pending) state for the report’s status field when an action is pending in the To-Do search results.

Fixed Issues

$ #78599
PROPOSAL: #78599 (comment)

Tests

Precondition: Have some draft reports (two is sufficient).

  1. Go to Reports → Submit.
  2. Visit all listed reports by clicking each report or using the Next button in the carousel.
  3. Go back to Reports.
  4. Go offline.
  5. Open the first report and click Submit.
  6. Go to the Approve tab.
  7. Verify that the submitted report’s status has lower opacity (indicating a pending state).
  8. Go online.
  9. Verify that after some time (once the submit request is successful), the opacity returns to normal / the status is no longer pending.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Precondition: Have some draft reports (two is sufficient).

  1. Go to Reports → Submit.
  2. Visit all listed reports by clicking each report or using the Next button in the carousel.
  3. Go back to Reports.
  4. Go offline.
  5. Open the first report and click Submit.
  6. Go to the Approve tab.
  7. Verify that the submitted report’s status has lower opacity (indicating a pending state).
  8. Go online.
  9. Verify that after some time (once the submit request is successful), the opacity returns to normal / the status is no longer pending.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • [] If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native_d.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_mweb_d.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native_d.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_msafari_d.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
macos_web_d.mp4

…ing while offline

Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
@tsa321 tsa321 requested review from a team as code owners January 16, 2026 02:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from dukenv0307 and trjExpensify and removed request for a team and trjExpensify January 16, 2026 02:52
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@dukenv0307 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 16, 2026 02:52
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

App/src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts

Lines 1769 to 1772 in c882930

const isActionLoading = isActionLoadingSet?.has(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_METADATA}${reportItem.reportID}`);
if (queryJSON && !isActionLoading) {
if (queryJSON.type === CONST.SEARCH.DATA_TYPES.EXPENSE) {
const status = queryJSON.status;

P2 Badge Reapply action filter for expense-report searches

The getReportSections filtering now only checks status for EXPENSE queries and no longer considers the action filter that powers the Submit/Approve/Pay/Export canned searches. This means when results are built locally (e.g., offline or when using cached snapshot data), an action:approve/action:submit query can show reports in the wrong state because the action predicate is never applied. That’s a regression in the search semantics (the query still includes action), so those tabs/filters will be inconsistent with the intended results unless action filtering is restored or scoped to allow the pending exception explicitly.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/ReportSearchHeader/index.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/Search/index.tsx 33.05% <ø> (ø)
...stWithSections/Search/ExpenseReportListItemRow.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/SearchUIUtils.ts 64.41% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
...ts/SelectionListWithSections/Search/StatusCell.tsx 66.66% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 34 files with indirect coverage changes

return [filteredData1, filteredData1.length, allLength];
}, [
searchKey,
isFocused,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dukenv0307 Yes, it’s needed so the data gets updated when the user goes back to the search list after viewing the report.
If I don’t include this, the pending data won’t update properly.

archivedReportsIDList: archivedReportsIdSet,
isActionLoadingSet,
cardFeeds,
shouldSkipActionFiltering: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need to remove shouldSkipActionFiltering? I don't see you mentioning it in the proposal.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was added to fix a regression caused by the offending PR. Since I am reverting the original PR, this is no longer needed.

type ReportSearchHeaderProps = {
/** Report, if we're showing the details for one and using AvatarWithDisplay */
report?: OnyxEntry<Report>;
report?: ExpenseReportListItemType;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, the data type passed to ReportSearchHeader is ExpenseReportListItemType.

and OnyxEntry is only part of it. Since isReportStatePending is not part of OnyxEntry<Report>, I need to use the full type.

@@ -1795,11 +1779,6 @@
shouldShow = isValidExpenseStatus(status) ? expenseStatusActionMapping[status](reportItem) : false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a comment for this change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tsa321 tsa321 Jan 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn’t modify these lines—below this, I’m only reverting the offending PR. What comment are you referring to?

@mkhutornyi
Copy link
Contributor

Offending PR is being reverted. Please hold this for #79714
cc: @luacmartins

@tsa321
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsa321 commented Jan 16, 2026

@dukenv0307 I’ve replied to your comments. Should we tag or loop in the design team?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

#79714 is merged

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@tsa321 can you please merge main?

@tsa321
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsa321 commented Jan 19, 2026

@dukenv0307 I have merged main

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@tsa321 Thank you, can you please confirm with @Expensify/design team about showing the offline indicator?

@tsa321 tsa321 changed the title Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline [HOLD] Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline Jan 22, 2026
@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good!

@trjExpensify trjExpensify changed the title [HOLD] Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline [HOLD PR#79506] Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline Jan 23, 2026
@tsa321
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsa321 commented Jan 24, 2026

@trjExpensify Since PR #79506 has been merged, reports are now listed under the correct action tab when offline. Do we still want to show a pending state on the status field for reports that have been submitted or approved while offline?

It would look something like this:

Screen.Recording.2026-01-24.at.07.53.37.mov

@tsa321 tsa321 changed the title [HOLD PR#79506] Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline Jan 26, 2026
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify @luacmartins can you please take a look at the comment above ^?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

luacmartins commented Jan 27, 2026

Not sure if we need the pending state, but the main issue is fixed now. cc @trjExpensify

@trjExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Mhm... I think we probably should still do the pending state change as it can be rolled back when coming back online if it fails. 👍

@tsa321 tsa321 changed the title Fix report not displayed in search action tabs after submitting, approving, etc while offline Display Pending State in Report Status for To-Do Search Results Jan 28, 2026
@tsa321 tsa321 changed the title Display Pending State in Report Status for To-Do Search Results Support displaying a pending state in the report status for To-Do search results when an action is pending Jan 28, 2026
@tsa321
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsa321 commented Jan 28, 2026

@dukenv0307 I’ve updated the code.

const {isLargeScreenWidth} = useResponsiveLayout();

const statusContainerStyle = useMemo(() => {
return [isLargeScreenWidth ? styles.mt1 : styles.mt0Half, report?.isReportStatePending && styles.offlineFeedbackPending];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should apply offlineFeedbackPending if report?.isReportStatePending and isOffline?

Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tsaqif <tsaiinkwa@yahoo.com>
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-01-29.at.10.06.16.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2026-01-29.at.10.01.53.mov
iOS: HybridApp
Screen.Recording.2026-01-29.at.10.06.45.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-01-29.at.10.02.16.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-01-29.at.09.56.24.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from robertjchen January 29, 2026 03:07
@robertjchen
Copy link
Contributor

Woo

@robertjchen robertjchen merged commit 735721f into Expensify:main Jan 29, 2026
30 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/robertjchen in version: 9.3.11-16 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Feb 5, 2026

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.3.12-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants