Skip to content

[No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead#82370

Merged
roryabraham merged 25 commits intomainfrom
rory-remove-crashlytics
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

[No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead#82370
roryabraham merged 25 commits intomainfrom
rory-remove-crashlytics

Conversation

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham commented Feb 13, 2026

Explanation of Change

Remove Firebase Crashlytics from the App, replacing it with Sentry (which is already integrated). This also updates the deploy checklist to link to Sentry instead of Firebase Crashlytics.

Firebase Analytics and the web SDK are kept for Google Tag Manager.

Deploy checklist:

  • Rename isFirebaseChecked to isSentryChecked
  • Replace Firebase Crashlytics links with release-specific Sentry URLs
  • Add previousTag parameter so the checklist links to the exact previous Sentry release
  • Add explanation that checking the previous release matters because mobile deploys use a phased rollout

App source:

  • Replace Crashlytics usage with Sentry equivalents in ErrorBoundary, testCrash, and platformSetup
  • Delete setCrashlyticsUserId (redundant with Sentry.setUser())
  • Remove @react-native-firebase/crashlytics dependency

Native build config:

  • Remove crashlytics Gradle plugins and dependencies
  • Delete firebase.json (only contained crashlytics config)
  • Remove firebase.json 1Password download steps and cache key references from CI workflows

Depends on: https://github.com/Expensify/Mobile-Expensify/pull/13849 (Mobile-Expensify crashlytics removal -- submodule bump needed after merge)

Fixed Issues

$

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A - [No QA]

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

N/A - no UI changes

roryabraham and others added 3 commits February 12, 2026 23:49
- Rename isFirebaseChecked to isSentryChecked throughout the checklist
  generation and parsing code
- Replace Firebase Crashlytics links with release-specific Sentry URLs
  (current release filtered to staging environment, previous release
  without environment filter)
- Add previousTag parameter to generateStagingDeployCashBodyAndAssignees
  so the checklist can link to the specific previous Sentry release
- Add explanation that the previous release check matters because mobile
  deploys use a phased rollout and completing the checklist deploys the
  previous version to 100% of users
- Update tests and rebuild GH Actions bundles

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Replace Crashlytics error recording with Sentry.captureException in
  ErrorBoundary
- Replace Crashlytics logging with no-op in Firebase/index.native.ts
- Remove setCrashlyticsCollectionEnabled from platformSetup
- Replace Crashlytics crash() with Sentry.nativeCrash() in testCrash
- Remove setCrashlyticsUserId (Sentry.setUser already handles this)
- Update TestCrash component to not depend on firebase.json config
- Remove @react-native-firebase/crashlytics from package.json

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Delete firebase.json (only contained crashlytics config)
- Remove firebase-crashlytics-gradle classpath from android/build.gradle
- Remove firebase-crashlytics dependency and plugin from android/app/build.gradle
- Remove firebase.json 1Password download steps from deploy.yml
- Remove firebase.json from Pods cache keys in deploy.yml and
  verifyHybridApp.yml

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@roryabraham roryabraham requested review from a team as code owners February 13, 2026 07:54
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2026

npm has a package.json file and a package-lock.json file. It seems you updated one without the other, which is usually a sign of a mistake. If you are updating a package make sure that you update the version in package.json then run npm install

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and Julesssss and removed request for a team February 13, 2026 07:54
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2026

@Julesssss Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 13, 2026 07:54
- Regenerate package-lock.json after removing @react-native-firebase/crashlytics
- Remove patches/@react-native-firebase/crashlytics/ (patch-package patch
  no longer needed)
- Note: ios/Podfile.lock and Mobile-Expensify/iOS/Podfile.lock will be
  updated by CI when pod install runs during the build. Local CocoaPods
  version (1.12.1) doesn't support visionos syntax in dependencies.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

pod install removes RNFBCrashlytics, FirebaseCrashlytics, and their
transitive dependencies from the lockfile.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead [WIP][No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead Feb 13, 2026
Remove the import and setCrashlyticsCollectionEnabled call that was
missed in the initial Crashlytics removal.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@codex review

- Refactor generateStagingDeployCashBodyAndAssignees to use an options
  object for isSentryChecked, isGHStatusChecked, and previousTag (fixes
  @typescript-eslint/max-params violation)
- Use early return in platformSetup/index.native.ts (fixes
  rulesdir/prefer-early-return)
- Rename remaining isFirebaseChecked to isSentryChecked in test mock
  objects (fixes typecheck)
- Rebuild GH Actions bundles

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f1455e220b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

roryabraham and others added 2 commits February 13, 2026 01:03
- Replace Firebase.log() no-op with Sentry.addBreadcrumb() in
  Firebase/index.native.ts (addresses review comment about losing
  navigation breadcrumbs)
- Fix test: use version 1.0.2-2 in the version-bump test scenario
  (the Sentry URL must match the bumped version)
- Rebuild GH Actions bundles from clean install

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
- Firebase/index.native.ts: Replace crashlytics with Sentry.addBreadcrumb
  (this file was missed in the original commit)
- testCrash/index.native.ts: Replace with Sentry.nativeCrash()
- TestCrash/index.native.tsx: Remove firebase.json dependency
- GithubUtilsTest.ts: Update Firebase verification constants to Sentry
  (these were missed in the earlier test update)

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONFIG.ts 83.87% <ø> (ø)
src/Expensify.tsx 83.24% <ø> (-0.35%) ⬇️
src/components/TestCrash/index.native.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/libs/Navigation/NavigationRoot.tsx 78.02% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/ErrorBoundary/index.native.tsx 40.00% <0.00%> (-2.86%) ⬇️
src/libs/testCrash/index.native.ts 50.00% <0.00%> (-16.67%) ⬇️
src/setup/platformSetup/index.native.ts 75.00% <66.66%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

@roryabraham

This comment was marked as resolved.

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

roryabraham and others added 2 commits February 13, 2026 01:35
Delete the upload_dsyms and upload_dsyms_hybrid fastlane lanes that
uploaded dSYM files to Firebase Crashlytics. Sentry handles debug
symbol uploads via its own Xcode build phase and Gradle plugin.

Also remove the "Upload DSYMs to Firebase for HybridApp" step from
deploy.yml that called the now-deleted lane.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Add environment=production to the previous release Sentry URL so
deployers see only production crashes for the version being rolled
out to 100% of users.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP][HOLD Mobile-Expensify #13849][No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead [WIP][No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead Feb 20, 2026
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

The Firebase lib was a thin wrapper that only called
Sentry.addBreadcrumb on native and was a no-op on web.
Replace the single usage in NavigationRoot with a direct
Sentry.addBreadcrumb call that works on all platforms,
delete the now-unused Firebase lib, its dead web config,
and the @firebase/app dependency.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@roryabraham roryabraham changed the title [WIP][No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead [No QA] Remove Firebase Crashlytics, use Sentry instead Feb 20, 2026
@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Julesssss ready for review

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @Julesssss has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Julesssss commented Feb 20, 2026

Seems like something still expects Firebase to exist in the iOS build. Mayyybe will be resolved and is an outdated run? I'll try a test build

fatal error: 'FirebaseCrashlytics/FirebaseCrashlytics.h' file not found

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @Julesssss has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #82370.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩ https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-0fd785c-08338eb-d32373fa7d24fd22a04c4864da9bb755c990fa8b/index.html
The build for Android was skipped iOS
Web 🕸️
⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
The build for Web was skipped

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 1ea1155 into main Feb 20, 2026
39 checks passed
@roryabraham roryabraham deleted the rory-remove-crashlytics branch February 20, 2026 22:13
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @roryabraham has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.25-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.3.25-13 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants