Skip to content

fix: the input field is announced without entered value#82651

Merged
dangrous merged 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
daledah:fix/77547
Mar 18, 2026
Merged

fix: the input field is announced without entered value#82651
dangrous merged 12 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
daledah:fix/77547

Conversation

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor

@daledah daledah commented Feb 17, 2026

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #77547
PROPOSAL: #77547 (comment)

Tests

Prerequisites: the user is not signed in

  1. Using iOS VoiceOver, open the Expensify app
  2. Swipe to the 'Phone or email' input field and type the value
  3. Swipe to refocus the input field
  4. Listen to the VoiceOver announcement
  5. Verify that: The focused field should be announced with its role, name and entered value.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native Image
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.native.tsx 78.24% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
...s/TextInput/BaseTextInput/implementation/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 12 files with indirect coverage changes

@daledah daledah marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 15:07
@daledah daledah requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2026 15:07
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Ollyws and heyjennahay and removed request for a team February 17, 2026 15:07
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@Ollyws Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 17, 2026 15:07
@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 20, 2026

Hmm the behaviour of this seems somewhat inconsistent, for example on iOS the label is announced twice where as on Android it's not announced atall while editing:

Android_Native.mov
iOS_Native.mov

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Feb 24, 2026

iOS the label is announced twice

Screenshot 2026-02-24 at 15 02 39

On iOS, I only see the label announced once.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Feb 24, 2026

on Android it's not announced atall while editing

I can't hear anything from your video. Could you please re-upload it?

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Feb 24, 2026

Screenshot 2026-02-24 at 15 19 56

For the failing check, it passes on my side

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 24, 2026

I can't hear anything from your video. Could you please re-upload it?

You can see what's being announced from the subtitles at the bottom of the screen.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 1, 2026

@Ollyws My Android simulator doesn't have the TallBack feature

@heyjennahay could you please trigger to build adhoc then i can test with the real device?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

🚧 @dangrous has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@Ollyws all yours

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 4, 2026

I'll try to test on the real Android device today

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 5, 2026

android-resize.mp4

@Ollyws it's working fine with the real Android device

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Mar 6, 2026

@daleh I'm getting exactly the same behaviour on a real device as my earlier simulator video:

Screen_Recording_20260306_094245_Expensify.Adhoc.mp4

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 9, 2026

@daleh I'm getting exactly the same behaviour on a real device as my earlier simulator video:

@Ollyws did you use TallBack? Btw i can see the input value is announced here

Screenshot 2026-03-09 at 15 08 48

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Mar 9, 2026

@daledah Correct that the input value is anounced, but the problem is that the 'Phone or email' label is never anounced on Android but it is announced on iOS.

so this is good to approve?

Not quite yet.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 10, 2026

Correct that the input value is anounced, but the problem is that the 'Phone or email' label is never anounced on Android but it is announced on iOS.

@Ollyws So what is the expected behavior here? Should the ‘Phone or email’ label be announced or not?

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Mar 10, 2026

Should the ‘Phone or email’ label be announced or not?

I think the announcement should include the label, role and value. Consistently for both Android and iOS.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 12, 2026

@Ollyws The root cause is that Android TalkBack (16.x) prioritizes reading the actual text content of EditText over contentDescription (which is what accessibilityLabel maps to on Android) — this is both a documented Android behavior and a known React Native bug.

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 12, 2026

The failing test is not related to our changes, i'll merge main to fix it soon

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane requested a review from Ollyws March 16, 2026 22:25
@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@Ollyws all yours

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Mar 16, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
01_Android_Native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
02_Android_Chrome.mp4
iOS: HybridApp
03_iOS_Native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
04_iOS_Safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from #82651 (comment) LGTM. Approving to keep it moving.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dangrous March 16, 2026 23:41
Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me except a) conflicts and b) let's stick to the new flow for the error stuff re: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/82964/changes - thanks!

@daledah
Copy link
Contributor Author

daledah commented Mar 17, 2026

@dangrous i resolved conflict and updated, please check again

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane requested a review from dangrous March 18, 2026 14:53
@dangrous dangrous merged commit ba8d62a into Expensify:main Mar 18, 2026
31 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @dangrous has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 9.3.41-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.41-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants