Skip to content

[NoQA] Implement freeze and unfreeze actions and modals#82709

Merged
MariaHCD merged 5 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
ShridharGoel:freezeCard4
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

[NoQA] Implement freeze and unfreeze actions and modals#82709
MariaHCD merged 5 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
ShridharGoel:freezeCard4

Conversation

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel commented Feb 17, 2026

Explanation of Change

Implement freeze and unfreeze actions and modals

Fixed Issues

$ #81639
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Precondition: Enable the freeze card beta and should have an Expensify card.

  1. Go to Account > Wallet.
  2. Click on any Expensify card.
  3. Verify that freeze card option is visible at the bottom of the details page.
  4. Click on freeze card.
  5. Verify that confirmation modal shows.
  6. Confirm by clicking "Freeze card".
  7. Verify that the freeze option gets removed and instead unfreeze option shows below the card image.
  8. Click on "Unfreeze card".
  9. Verify that confirmation modal shows.
  10. Confirm by clicking "Unfreeze card".
  11. Verify that the unfreeze option gets removed and instead freeze option shows at the bottom of the details page.
  12. Verify that clicking cancel on any modal closes the modal.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-18.at.1.23.28.AM.mov

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2026 20:00
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2026 20:00
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Pujan92 and joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team February 17, 2026 20:00
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Code Review - PR #82709

Bug: Wrong first argument passed to freezeCard and unfreezeCard

File: src/pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage/index.tsx

The freezeCard and unfreezeCard functions in src/libs/actions/Card.ts expect workspaceAccountID as the first parameter:

// Function signatures in Card.ts:
function freezeCard(workspaceAccountID: number, card: Card, currentUserAccountID: number)
function unfreezeCard(workspaceAccountID: number, card: Card)

But the PR passes fundID instead:

// What the PR does:
Card.freezeCard(Number(currentCard?.fundID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID), currentCard, session?.accountID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID);
Card.unfreezeCard(Number(currentCard?.fundID ?? CONST.DEFAULT_NUMBER_ID), currentCard);

fundID and workspaceAccountID are different values. The workspaceAccountID is used internally by buildCardListUpdates to construct the correct Onyx key for optimistic updates. Passing fundID will cause the optimistic data to target the wrong Onyx key, meaning the UI won't reflect the freeze/unfreeze state change correctly.


UX inconsistency: Unfreeze button placement and component type differ from Freeze

File: src/pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage/index.tsx

The unfreeze action uses a Button component placed at the top of the page (right after CardPreview), while the freeze action uses a MenuItem placed at the bottom (after View Transactions). This creates an inconsistent experience — the same toggle action appears in different locations with different visual treatments.

Consider placing both actions in the same position with the same component type for a symmetric UX.


Translation files look correct

The 10 language files add consistent translation keys (unfreeze, unfreezeCard, freezeDescription, unfreezeDescription) that match the English source strings. No issues found with the translations.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
.../pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage/index.tsx 66.66% <82.60%> (+3.50%) ⬆️
... and 101 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d407282730

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

#82709 (comment) -> This is not valid.

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Feb 18, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-18.at.17.33.39.mov
Screen.Recording.2026-02-18.at.17.34.05.mov

isVisible={isFreezeModalVisible}
onConfirm={handleConfirmFreeze}
onCancel={handleDismissFreezeModal}
onBackdropPress={handleDismissFreezeModal}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to close on backdrop press?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MariaHCD Can you confirm?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it should be fine to close?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we close on backdrop press for other confirmation modals in the app?

I think it should be fine to close in this case but would be good to be consistent with whatever the current approach is!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems to be a mixed approach. At some places this is done while ignored at others.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I don't see a specific reason why we wouldn't allow closing when the backdrop is pressed. Let's go with this approach for now. If needed, we can always update this in the future.

Copy link
Contributor

@Pujan92 Pujan92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Need to confirm #82709 (comment) by @MariaHCD

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #81639 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from NikkiWines February 18, 2026 12:27
@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Feb 18, 2026

Do we need to add NoQA tag for the PR?

@ShridharGoel ShridharGoel changed the title Implement freeze and unfreeze actions and modals [NoQA] Implement freeze and unfreeze actions and modals Feb 18, 2026
@ShridharGoel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added, this will be tested once the feature is ready for release 1

@MariaHCD MariaHCD requested review from MariaHCD and removed request for NikkiWines February 18, 2026 12:45
@MariaHCD
Copy link
Contributor

One last clarification but I think looks good to go!

#82709 (comment)

@MariaHCD MariaHCD merged commit 6a4702c into Expensify:main Feb 18, 2026
37 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @MariaHCD has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MariaHCD in version: 9.3.22-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.22-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 cancelled 🔪
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.22-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 failure ❌
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants