Skip to content

[No QA] Update file name to TriNet.md#82719

Merged
VictoriaExpensify merged 2 commits intomainfrom
stephanieelliott-patch-32
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

[No QA] Update file name to TriNet.md#82719
VictoriaExpensify merged 2 commits intomainfrom
stephanieelliott-patch-32

Conversation

@stephanieelliott
Copy link
Contributor

file name change

@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott self-assigned this Feb 18, 2026
title: TriNet-Integration
title: TriNet
description: Learn how to integrate TriNet with Expensify to automatically sync employees and manage approvals.
keywords: [Expensify Classic, TriNet, Zenefits, Expensify, HR integration, employee sync, approval workflow]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Readiness / Metadata consistency: The keywords still include "Zenefits" even though the file has been renamed to TriNet.md and the title updated to TriNet. If "Zenefits" is kept intentionally for SEO redirect purposes (since TriNet acquired Zenefits), consider adding a note in the description or keeping it. Otherwise, remove "Zenefits" from the keywords to avoid confusion, or at minimum reorder so "TriNet" related terms come first and "Zenefits" is listed as a legacy/alias term at the end.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This is a straightforward file rename from Zenefits.md to TriNet.md with a minor title cleanup in the YAML frontmatter (removing the hyphenated -Integration suffix). The change correctly aligns the filename with the current product name (TriNet acquired Zenefits). The article content itself is well-written and unchanged.

Scores Summary

  • Readability: 9/10 - The existing article content is clear, well-organized, and uses plain language. Numbered steps and bold formatting are used effectively. No changes to body content in this PR.
  • AI Readiness: 8/10 - Descriptive headings, proper YAML metadata, and clear context. The title cleanup from TriNet-Integration to TriNet improves consistency with peer articles (e.g., Rippling.md uses just Rippling as its title). One minor gap: the keywords array still includes Zenefits, which is acceptable for search discoverability but worth noting.
  • Style Compliance: 9/10 - Follows Expensify documentation conventions. Proper heading hierarchy (# and ## only), FAQ section format, and consistent use of bold for UI elements and notes.

Key Findings

  • Positive: The filename now matches the product name, which is consistent with how other connection articles are named in this directory (e.g., Rippling.md, Gusto.md, Deel.md). The title simplification from TriNet-Integration to TriNet also matches the naming pattern of peer articles.
  • Positive: A redirect from the old Zenefits URL to the new TriNet URL already exists in redirects.csv (line 904), so existing bookmarks and external links will not break.
  • Minor concern: Two older redirects in redirects.csv (lines 245 and 275) still point to connections/Zenefits as their destination. After this rename, those become a two-hop redirect chain (HR-integrations/Zenefits -> connections/Zenefits -> connections/TriNet). Depending on how the site handles redirect chains, these may or may not resolve correctly. Consider updating lines 245 and 275 to point directly to connections/TriNet to avoid any potential issues.

Recommendations

  1. Low priority: Update the two stale redirect destinations in docs/redirects.csv (lines 245 and 275) to point directly to https://help.expensify.com/articles/expensify-classic/connections/TriNet instead of the now-removed Zenefits path. This eliminates the redirect chain and ensures all legacy URLs resolve in a single hop.
  2. No other changes needed -- the rename and title update are clean and correct.

Files Reviewed

  • docs/articles/expensify-classic/connections/Zenefits.md -> docs/articles/expensify-classic/connections/TriNet.md - Filename rename and title cleanup. Content unchanged and well-structured.
  • docs/redirects.csv - Verified existing redirect coverage. Two older entries (lines 245, 275) could be updated to avoid a redirect chain.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
title: TriNet-Integration
title: TriNet
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Title change looks good. Removing the hyphenated "TriNet-Integration" in favor of the cleaner "TriNet" is the right call -- it aligns with AI Readiness best practices by using a clear, concise feature name as the title.

---
title: TriNet-Integration
title: TriNet
description: Learn how to integrate TriNet with Expensify to automatically sync employees and manage approvals.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI Readiness (pre-existing): Consider making the description more benefit-focused. Current description explains what the integration does, but could better highlight the user benefit. For example: "Automatically sync employees and approval workflows between TriNet and Expensify -- no manual setup needed."

@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott requested a review from a team February 18, 2026 00:27
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Concierge reviewer checklist:

  • I have verified the accuracy of the article
    • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
    • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
    • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
  • I have verified the readability of the article
    • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
    • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
    • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
  • I have verified the formatting of the article
    • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
    • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
  • I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
    • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
    • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
  • I have verified the overall quality of the article
    • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
    • The article fully addresses user needs.
  • I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @greg-schroeder

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from greg-schroeder and removed request for a team February 18, 2026 00:28
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@greg-schroeder Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2026 01:02
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from blimpich and removed request for a team February 18, 2026 01:03
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@blimpich Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

NOTE: It looks like docs/redirects.csv was modified in this PR. Please see this SO for special instructions on how to review changes to that file.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Update file name to TriNet.md [No QA] Update file name to TriNet.md Feb 18, 2026
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://77beda00.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️

Updated articles:

@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott requested review from VictoriaExpensify and removed request for blimpich and greg-schroeder February 18, 2026 01:24
@VictoriaExpensify VictoriaExpensify merged commit 476152d into main Feb 18, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@VictoriaExpensify VictoriaExpensify deleted the stephanieelliott-patch-32 branch February 18, 2026 02:56
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@VictoriaExpensify looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/VictoriaExpensify in version: 9.3.22-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.22-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 cancelled 🔪
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.22-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 failure ❌
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants