[No QA] Add reasonAttributes to ActivityIndicator usage sites by sosek108 · Pull Request #84727 · Expensify/App

sosek108 · 2026-03-10T11:12:35Z

Explanation of Change

Added reasonAttributes (with SkeletonSpanReasonAttributes) to all ActivityIndicator usage sites so that Sentry telemetry spans can capture the loading context for each site. This makes it possible to identify which components are responsible for long or infinite loading states in production.

Files updated:

AddPlaidBankAccount — tracks plaidData.isLoading
AddToWalletButton/index.native — tracks isLoading
PlaidLink — tracks ready / isPlaidLoaded
ReimbursementAccount/.../BankAccountDetails — tracks corpayFields.isLoading
ReimbursementAccount/.../Confirmation — tracks corpayFields.isLoading
PersonalCardDetailsHeaderMenu — tracks isLoadingLastUpdated
WalletPage — tracks shouldShowLoadingSpinner
CopyCodesPage — tracks account.isLoading
SubscriptionPlanCard — tracks !privateSubscription (data not yet loaded)

Fixed Issues

$ #83394
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

codecov · 2026-03-10T11:21:33Z

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/components/AddPlaidBankAccount.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
src/components/AddToWalletButton/index.native.tsx	`52.38% <0.00%> (ø)`
...nt/NonUSD/BankInfo/subSteps/BankAccountDetails.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...tAccount/NonUSD/BankInfo/subSteps/Confirmation.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
.../settings/Security/TwoFactorAuth/CopyCodesPage.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
...cription/SubscriptionPlan/SubscriptionPlanCard.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
src/pages/settings/Wallet/WalletPage/index.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
src/components/PlaidLink/index.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
.../settings/Wallet/PersonalCardDetailsHeaderMenu.tsx	`0.00% <0.00%> (ø)`
... and 9 files with indirect coverage changes

melvin-bot · 2026-03-10T11:35:57Z

@huult Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c382002a69

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-03-10T11:44:43Z

src/pages/settings/Wallet/WalletPage/index.tsx

    const hasFailedOnfido = userWallet?.hasFailedOnfido ?? false;
    const hasEligibleActiveAdmin = hasEligibleActiveAdminFromWorkspaces(allPolicies, currentUserLogin, paymentMethod?.selectedPaymentMethod?.bankAccountID?.toString());
    const paidGroupPolicy = Object.values(allPolicies ?? {}).find(isPaidGroupPolicy);
+    const walletLoadingReasonAttributes: SkeletonSpanReasonAttributes = {context: 'WalletPage', shouldShowLoadingSpinner};


Memoize spinner reason attributes before passing props

This object is recreated on every render, so ActivityIndicator receives a new reasonAttributes reference each time. In useSkeletonSpan (src/libs/telemetry/useSkeletonSpan.ts), the [reasonAttributes, spanId] effect treats that as a change and calls span.addEvent(...) on every re-render while the spinner is mounted, which can generate noisy telemetry and unnecessary overhead during loading states (especially on WalletPage, which re-renders from Onyx/network updates). Please memoize this object (e.g., useMemo keyed by shouldShowLoadingSpinner) so span attribute updates are emitted only when values actually change.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

I think it makes sense. @sosek108 what do you think?

huult · 2026-03-10T11:45:06Z

I can review this PR if needed.

sosek108 · 2026-03-10T11:58:42Z

I can review this PR if needed.
@huult do review, please

JmillsExpensify

No product review required.

huult · 2026-03-11T06:50:09Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

huult · 2026-03-11T06:53:20Z

@codex review

huult · 2026-03-11T07:06:59Z

Added reasonAttributes (with SkeletonSpanReasonAttributes) to all ActivityIndicator usage sites so that

@sosek108 Just confirming the scope of this PR: should we only add reasonAttributes to the files mentioned above?

huult

LGTM!

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-03-11T07:19:03Z

Codex Review: Something went wrong. Try again later by commenting “@codex review”.

We were unable to download your code in a timely manner.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

sosek108 · 2026-03-11T08:47:30Z

@huult yes, only mentioned files. In the end I'll do double check if we missed anything

huult · 2026-03-11T08:49:41Z

Thanks for confirming!

OSBotify · 2026-03-13T05:09:16Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

github-actions · 2026-03-13T05:18:05Z

🚧 @youssef-lr has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2026-03-13T05:22:54Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #84727.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-d15ad5c-59ef620-3cc896fc4855ef5ba40036734a4bc5345cddb27f/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-d15ad5c-59ef620-fc9867cb543d5054331d0806038591fe7b07c26c/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://84727.pr-testing.expensify.com

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

OSBotify · 2026-03-16T10:32:19Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 9.3.38-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

OSBotify · 2026-03-17T11:28:25Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.38-4 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Add reasonAttributes to ActivityIndicator usage sites

c382002

melvin-bot bot assigned sosek108 Mar 10, 2026

sosek108 marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 11:35

sosek108 requested review from a team as code owners March 10, 2026 11:35

melvin-bot bot requested review from huult and removed request for a team March 10, 2026 11:35

melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team March 10, 2026 11:35

chatgpt-codex-connector bot reviewed Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

JmillsExpensify reviewed Mar 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

huult approved these changes Mar 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from youssef-lr March 11, 2026 07:07

youssef-lr approved these changes Mar 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

youssef-lr merged commit d15ad5c into Expensify:main Mar 13, 2026
34 of 36 checks passed

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2026

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2026-03-16 #85347

Closed

74 tasks

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026

[Due for payment 2026-03-24] Add reasonAttributes to ActivityIndicator usage sites #83394

Open

Conversation

sosek108 commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 • edited by github-actions bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot Mar 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

huult Mar 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

huult commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

sosek108 commented Mar 10, 2026

Uh oh!

JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

huult commented Mar 11, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

Uh oh!

huult commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

huult commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

huult left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

sosek108 commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

huult commented Mar 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 16, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Mar 17, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

sosek108 commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2026 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading