Skip to content

[CP Staging] Fix: Reimbursable title is truncated when sorted by Reimbursable#85668

Merged
JS00001 merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
twilight2294:issue85655
Mar 18, 2026
Merged

[CP Staging] Fix: Reimbursable title is truncated when sorted by Reimbursable#85668
JS00001 merged 4 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
twilight2294:issue85655

Conversation

@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor

@twilight2294 twilight2294 commented Mar 18, 2026

Explanation of Change

The Reimbursable column header text gets truncated when sorted because the sort arrow icon takes extra space. The column width is fixed at 80px which isn't enough when the sort indicator is visible.

Pass isActive to getReportTableColumnStyles so the REIMBURSABLE/BILLABLE columns use w92 (92px) when actively sorted and w80 (80px) otherwise.

Fixed Issues

$ #85655
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Go to Reports > Expenses.
  2. Click Columns.
  3. Select Reimbursable and click Apply.
  4. Click Reimbursable title on the table header.

Verify that Reimbursable title will not be truncated when sorted by Reimbursable.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
Screen.Recording.2026-03-18.at.8.55.20.PM.mov

@twilight2294 twilight2294 requested review from a team as code owners March 18, 2026 15:15
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from hungvu193 and removed request for a team March 18, 2026 15:15
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 18, 2026

@hungvu193 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team March 18, 2026 15:15
@twilight2294 twilight2294 changed the title Fix: Reimbursable title is truncated when sorted by Reimbursable [CP Staging] Fix: Reimbursable title is truncated when sorted by Reimbursable Mar 18, 2026
case CONST.SEARCH.TABLE_COLUMNS.REIMBURSABLE:
case CONST.SEARCH.TABLE_COLUMNS.BILLABLE:
columnWidth = {...getWidthStyle(variables.w80)};
columnWidth = {...getWidthStyle(isActive ? variables.w92 : variables.w80)};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

getReportTableColumnStyles is a shared utility called by both the header (SortableTableHeader.tsx) and data rows (TransactionItemRow/index.tsx). The header now passes isActive (line 93 of SortableTableHeader.tsx), but the data row callers at TransactionItemRow/index.tsx:391 and :400 do not pass isActive, so it defaults to false. This means when sorting by Reimbursable or Billable:

  • Header column: w92 (92px) because isActive = true
  • Data row column: w80 (80px) because isActive defaults to false

This 12px width mismatch between the header and data columns will cause visual misalignment. The REIMBURSABLE/BILLABLE columns do not use flex1, so there is no flex mechanism to absorb this difference.

The existing pattern for other dynamic-width columns (DATE, SUBMITTED, APPROVED, POSTED, EXPORTED) ensures both the header and data rows pass the same isWide boolean. This change should follow the same pattern.

Suggested fix: Instead of conditionally widening only the header, always use w92 for both header and data rows:

case CONST.SEARCH.TABLE_COLUMNS.REIMBURSABLE:
case CONST.SEARCH.TABLE_COLUMNS.BILLABLE:
    columnWidth = {...getWidthStyle(variables.w92)};
    break;

This avoids the mismatch entirely and gives the column enough room for the header text regardless of sort state.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shawnborton So we have an issue with the width 80 of the reibursable column if the column has an active sort. We decided to add a check here so we will keep the width 92 if the sort is active and otherwise revert the width to 80. However, we will see the UI jumping for the first time when the sort is enabled. What do you think about this approach?

Screen.Recording.2026-03-18.at.22.16.41.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly I think the best solution is not to use conditional widths here. Just use a width that works well in all cases, whether it's actively sorted or not. We don't want the table jumping.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated:

Screen.Recording.2026-03-18.at.9.27.22.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That feels better to me!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@twilight2294 I'll go ahead and approve it for now. But we still need to resolve this width issue for ReportScreen's reimbursable case.

JS00001
JS00001 previously approved these changes Mar 18, 2026
@twilight2294
Copy link
Contributor Author

twilight2294 commented Mar 18, 2026

Works good:

Screen.Recording.2026-03-18.at.8.55.20.PM.mov

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 809cbc24f0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Please don't merge this, it's not working well.

You can't just change the width of the table header column, you need to also change the width of the column in the table body. Otherwise they don't line up and it's shifted.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

CleanShot 2026-03-18 at 11 29 39@2x

@hungvu193
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from JS00001 March 18, 2026 16:06
@JS00001 JS00001 merged commit 146ddbb into Expensify:main Mar 18, 2026
33 of 35 checks passed
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2026
[CP Staging] Fix: Reimbursable title is truncated when sorted by Reimbursable

(cherry picked from commit 146ddbb)

(cherry-picked to staging by cristipaval)
@OSBotify OSBotify added the CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging label Mar 18, 2026
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @JS00001 has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.40-1 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.41-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.41-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CP Staging marks PRs that have been CP'd to staging

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants