Skip to content

docs: document date range filter syntax in search operators article#86992

Merged
stephanieelliott merged 1 commit intomainfrom
melvinbot/helpsite-date-range-filter
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

docs: document date range filter syntax in search operators article#86992
stephanieelliott merged 1 commit intomainfrom
melvinbot/helpsite-date-range-filter

Conversation

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Updates the search operators help article (docs/articles/new-expensify/reports-and-expenses/Using-search-operators.md) to document the new date range comparison syntax (>=, <=) for date filters
  • This documents the text-based query syntax that corresponds to the new Custom Range UI feature added in feat: date range filter UI and year picker fix (#81501) #85313

Changes

  • date: filter description now mentions range comparisons (e.g., date>=2024-01-01 date<=2024-01-31)
  • Report date filters (submitted:, approved:, paid:, exported:) now mention range comparison support

Test plan

  • Verify the updated article renders correctly on the help site
  • Verify the documented syntax examples match the actual search behavior

Document the new date range comparison operators (>=, <=) for date and
report date filters, added in PR #85313.

Co-authored-by: btkcodedev <btkcodedev@users.noreply.github.com>
@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott merged commit d1dbbcb into main Apr 8, 2026
17 checks passed
@stephanieelliott stephanieelliott deleted the melvinbot/helpsite-date-range-filter branch April 8, 2026 06:46
@m-natarajan
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@stephanieelliott Is this one Internal PR?

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 9, 2026

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stephanieelliott in version: 9.3.55-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @MelvinBot. Do we need to QA something here?

cc @stephanieelliott

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants