-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Description
Description
Summary
When acting as a route reflector, FRR does not advertise EVPN Extended Communities containing Encapsulation Type (ET:8, VXLAN) to eBGP EVPN peers, even when correctly configured with send-community all at the neighbor level. This results in downstream devices being unable to properly interpret the encapsulation type for type-5 EVPN routes and defaulting to MPLS instead of VXLAN.
Environment
- FRR Version: 10.3.1_git (confirmed current behavior)
- Topology: Leaf-Spine (Route Reflector scenario)
- Leaf (OcNOS): 192.168.3.3 (eBGP with FRR spine)
- Spine (FRR): 192.168.3.250 (eBGP with leafs, RR for EVPN)
Steps to Reproduce
-
Set up a BGP EVPN leaf-spine fabric with FRR as route reflector:
- leafs and spine running EVPN, all configured with
send-community allon all EVPN neighbors
- leafs and spine running EVPN, all configured with
-
Learn type-5 prefix routes with ET:8 (VXLAN) in extended community from upstream leafs
-
Check advertised routes from the spine to a leaf (eBGP):
show bgp l2vpn evpn neighbors <leaf-ip> advertised-routes -
No extended communities (including ET:8) are present in advertisements, even though received routes have ET:8.
Expected Behavior
- FRR should relay all received extended communities (including encapsulation ET:8) to downstream eBGP peers when
send-community allis set. - Downstream EVPN receivers (like OcNOS) should be able to interpret VXLAN encapsulation correctly.
Actual Behavior
-
Extended Community (ET: 8) is present in received routes:
Route Distinguisher: 192.168.11.2:3 *> [5]:[0]:[24]:[192.168.11.0] 100.65.0.2 0 0 64512 ? RT:64512:100 ET: 8 Rmac:aa: bb:cc:00:00:65 -
But when advertising to 192.168.3.3 (OcNOS or any other frr leaf):
show bgp l2vpn evpn neighbors 192.168.3.3 advertised-routes Route Distinguisher: 192.168.11.2:3 *> [5]:[0]:[24]:[192.168.11.0] 0 64512 ? (No Extended Community line) -
A permissive route-map does not resolve the issue.
Impact
- Interoperability breaks for VXLAN EVPN overlays when FRR is used as route reflector.
- Devices downstream may default to MPLS (incorrect) because Extended Community is missing.
Workarounds Tried
send-community allat neighbor and global BGP level- Adding a route-map (permit any) on the RR neighbor
- Restarting BGP sessions
- Upstream routes are confirmed to include ET:8, but not advertised to neighbors
Request
Please investigate and advise:
- Is this a known bug in FRR 10.3.1?
- Are there configuration steps required to ensure FRR relays EVPN encapsulation extended communities to eBGP peers?
- Is there a version where this is resolved?
Let us know if further logs or PCAPs are required.
Version
FRRouting 10.3.1_git (spine) on Linux(5.10.0-22-amd64).
Copyright 1996-2005 Kunihiro Ishiguro, et al.
configured with:
'--prefix=/usr' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--localstatedir=/var' '--sbindir=/usr/lib/frr' '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--enable-rpki' '--enable-vtysh' '--enable-multipath=64' '--enable-vty-group=frrvty' '--enable-user=frr' '--enable-group=frr' '--enable-pcre2posix' '--enable-scripting' 'CC=gcc' 'CXX=g++'
How to reproduce
[Leaf1 (AS 64512)] ----eBGP---- [Spine/RR (AS 64612)] ----eBGP---- [Leaf2 (AS 2202)]
VXLAN EVPN FRR 10.3.1 OcNOS/FRR
###Spine (FRR 10.3.1 - Route Reflector):
router bgp 64612
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 64512
neighbor 192.168.3.3 remote-as 2202
neighbor 192.168.1.1 send-community all
neighbor 192.168.3.3 send-community all
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
neighbor 192.168.1.1 activate
neighbor 192.168.3.3 activate
advertise-all-vni
exit-address-family
exit
###Leaf1 (Originating EVPN routes with VXLAN):
router bgp 64512
no bgp ebgp-requires-policy
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor 192.168.3.250 remote-as 64612
neighbor 192.168.3.250 send-community extended
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
neighbor 192.168.3.250 activate
advertise-all-vni
advertise ipv4 unicast
exit-address-family
exit
!
interface vxlan1
vxlan id 100
vxlan local-tunnelip 100. 64.0.1
exit
Expected behavior
Encapsulation should be relayed to other peers as received
Actual behavior
On spines
show bgp l2vpn evpn
Route Distinguisher: 192.168.10.2:3
*> [5]:[0]:[24]:[192.168.10.0]
100.64.0.1 0 0 64512 ?
RT:64512:100 ET: 8 Rmac:aa: bb:cc:00:00:64
show bgp l2vpn evpn neighbors 192.168.3.3 advertised-routes
Route Distinguisher: 192.168.10.2:3
*> [5]:[0]:[24]:[192.168.10.0]
0 64512 ?
(No Extended Community - ET:8 is missing!)
Attempted workaround with route map
route-map EVPN_OUT permit 10
exit
router bgp 64612
address-family l2vpn evpn
neighbor 192.168.3.3 route-map EVPN_OUT out
exit-address-family
exit
clear bgp l2vpn evpn 192.168.3.3 soft out
Additional context
No response
Checklist
- I have searched the open issues for this bug.
- I have not included sensitive information in this report.