feat: Send a standard User-Agent: sdk-name/version header#83
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 tasks
Zaimwa9
reviewed
Apr 15, 2026
Zaimwa9
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2026
Contributor
Zaimwa9
left a comment
Zaimwa9
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Still approving in case it's not possible to extract the version dynamically
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Flagsmith API cannot currently distinguish which SDK or version is making requests from this client. This is part of a cross-SDK effort to standardize User-Agent headers — iOS (Flagsmith/flagsmith-ios-client#95) and Flutter (Flagsmith/flagsmith-flutter-client#85) already ship theirs. The version strategy follows the same release-please approach decided during review of #77 (#77 (comment)).
Changes
Supersedes #77
Closes #73
Review effort: 1/5