Conversation
WalkthroughThe update introduces several enhancements across multiple plugins and utility functions. Notable changes include the implementation of a common utility function for extractors in various plugins, which enhances code maintainability and consistency. Additionally, the utility package has been optimized for data writing performance by adding a delay and utilizing an IO optimized writer. These refactorings improve both the efficiency and functionality of the extraction processes. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Extractor
participant Utility
participant Writer
User->>Extractor: Start extraction
Extractor->>Utility: Create records
Utility->>Extractor: Return records
Extractor->>Writer: Write records with delay
Writer-->>Extractor: Confirm records written
Extractor-->>User: Extraction complete
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
utils/extractor/src/index.ts
Outdated
| import api, { Flatfile } from '@flatfile/api' | ||
| import type { FlatfileListener } from '@flatfile/listener' | ||
| import { asyncBatch, slugify } from '@flatfile/util-common' | ||
| import { asyncBatch, createAllRecords, slugify } from '@flatfile/util-common' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we remove asyncBatch here now?
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
utils/extractor/src/index.ts (1)
1-3: Ensure consistent import style.The import statement for
apishould be corrected to align with the rest of the codebase. Replaceimport apiwithimport { FlatfileClient } as apito match the usage pattern.
utils/extractor/src/index.tsAnalysis chain
Ensure consistent import style.
The import statement for
apihas been changed to a default import. Verify that this change aligns with the rest of the codebase and thatapiis indeed exported as a default export.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `api` is exported as a default export in the codebase. # Test: Search for the export statement of `api`. Expect: `export default api`. rg --type ts -A 5 $'export default api'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify how `api` is exported in the codebase. # Test: Search for any export statements related to `api`. rg --type ts 'export .* api' -A 5Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any file that imports `@flatfile/api` to trace back the export of `api`. # Find all import statements for `@flatfile/api`. rg 'import .* from \'@flatfile/api\'' -A 5Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any file that imports `@flatfile/api` to trace back the export of `api`. # Find all import statements for `@flatfile/api`. rg "import .* from '@flatfile/api'" -A 5Length of output: 30814
utils/extractor/src/index.ts
Outdated
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| await new Promise((resolve) => { | ||
| setTimeout(resolve, 3_000) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we pull this 3_000 variable out into a config option?
2 participants
This makes the extractor use the far more efficient
createAllRecordsutility over theapi.records.create