Skip to content

Fix reviewers script output#613

Merged
meritmalling merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/reviewer-script
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Fix reviewers script output#613
meritmalling merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/reviewer-script

Conversation

@meritmalling
Copy link
Contributor

Please explain how to summarize this PR for the Changelog:

Tell code reviewer how and what to test:

Signed-off-by: Merit <merit@flatfile.io>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request modify the getReviewers.js script by adding a conditional check to the existing functionality. The script now checks if the reviewers array is empty before logging the results. If the array contains elements, it formats the list of reviewers into a comma-separated string for logging. This enhancement clarifies the output when reviewers are available while preserving the original behavior when no reviewers are present.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/scripts/getReviewers.js Added a conditional check to log a formatted string of reviewers if the array is not empty.

Possibly related PRs

  • Print reviewer to check, fix open pr step #603: The changes in this PR involve enhancing the visibility of reviewers in the GitHub Actions workflow, which is related to the main PR's focus on improving how reviewers are logged and displayed in the getReviewers.js script.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5feb28 and f979817.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/scripts/getReviewers.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/scripts/getReviewers.js (1)

55-57: LGTM!

The conditional check and logging of the comma-separated string of reviewers is a nice enhancement to the output. It provides a clearer representation of the reviewers when available, while maintaining the original logging behavior when the array is empty. The change does not introduce any logical errors or bugs and improves the readability of the output.


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@meritmalling meritmalling merged commit 95fbc9f into main Sep 24, 2024
@meritmalling meritmalling deleted the fix/reviewer-script branch September 24, 2024 18:33
This was referenced Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants