Conversation
![flatfile-nullify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31830338?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
carlbrugger
force-pushed
the
feat/PhoneValidator
branch
from
0d636b6 to
2cab375
Compare
carlbrugger
force-pushed
the
feat/PhoneValidator
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5ad565a to
57e1230
Compare
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes primarily to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
validate/phone/README.MD (3)
15-33: Improve consistency and formatting in the parameters sectionThere are a few minor issues in the parameters section:
- The heading levels for parameter names should be h3 instead of h4 for consistency.
- There's a formatting issue in the
sheetSlugparameter description.Please apply the following changes:
- Change all parameter headings from h4 to h3 by replacing
####with###.- Fix the formatting in the
sheetSlugparameter description:-#### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: **` - (optional) +### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: *` - (optional)Also, consider adding a brief explanation of what
*means as the default value forsheetSlug.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
44-48: Update the import name for consistencyThe import name doesn't accurately reflect the plugin's primary function of phone number validation.
Consider updating the import statement to better represent the plugin's functionality:
-import phoneFormatPlugin from '@flatfile/plugin-phone-format'; +import phoneValidatePlugin from '@flatfile/plugin-validate-phone';This change will make the import name more consistent with the plugin's name and primary function.
1-68: Overall documentation reviewThe README provides comprehensive and well-structured documentation for the
@flatfile/plugin-validate-phoneplugin. It covers essential aspects such as plugin description, configuration parameters, installation, and usage examples.To further improve the documentation:
- Consider adding a table of contents for easier navigation.
- Include information about supported phone number formats for each country.
- Provide examples of valid and invalid phone numbers for different countries.
- Add a section on error handling and how the plugin reports validation failures.
- Include information about any dependencies or requirements for using the plugin.
These additions would make the documentation even more comprehensive and user-friendly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
validate/phone/src/index.e2e.spec.ts (4)
34-41: Consider adding error handling for record deletion.The afterEach hook deletes records if they exist, which is good for maintaining a clean state. However, it might be beneficial to add error handling to ensure the deletion process doesn't fail silently.
Consider wrapping the deletion process in a try-catch block:
afterEach(async () => { listener.reset() const records = await getRecords(sheetId) if (records.length > 0) { const ids = records.map((record) => record.id) - await api.records.delete(sheetId, { ids }) + try { + await api.records.delete(sheetId, { ids }) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to delete records:', error) + } } })
43-64: Consider adding more diverse test cases.The current test case covers basic scenarios for phone number validation and formatting. To improve test coverage, consider adding more diverse test cases, including:
- Phone numbers with different formats (e.g., with country code, with spaces or dashes).
- Edge cases like very long or very short phone numbers.
- Phone numbers from countries with different formatting rules.
Here's an example of how you could expand the test cases:
await createRecords(sheetId, [ { phone: '1234567890', country: 'US' }, { phone: '020 7946 0958', country: 'UK' }, { phone: 'invalid-phone', country: 'US' }, + { phone: '+1 (555) 123-4567', country: 'US' }, + { phone: '123', country: 'US' }, + { phone: '01234567890123456', country: 'IN' }, + { phone: '+81 3-1234-5678', country: 'JP' }, ])Don't forget to add corresponding expectations for these new test cases.
66-78: Expand test cases for missing country information.While the current test case checks for an empty country field, it would be beneficial to test additional scenarios related to missing or invalid country information. This will ensure robust handling of various edge cases.
Consider adding the following test cases:
- Country field is null or undefined.
- Country field contains an invalid country code.
- Country field contains a valid country code but in different formats (e.g., "US" vs "USA" vs "United States").
Example:
await createRecords(sheetId, [ { phone: '1234567890', country: '' }, + { phone: '1234567890', country: null }, + { phone: '1234567890', country: 'InvalidCountry' }, + { phone: '1234567890', country: 'USA' }, ]) // Add corresponding expectations for each new test case
80-94: Expand test cases for autoConvert: false and LGTM for overall structure.The test case correctly verifies the behavior when autoConvert is set to false. To improve coverage, consider adding more test cases with different phone number formats and countries.
Example of expanded test cases:
await createRecords(sheetId, [ { phone: '1234567890', country: 'US' }, + { phone: '+44 20 7946 0958', country: 'UK' }, + { phone: '(03) 9123 4567', country: 'AU' }, ]) // Add corresponding expectations for each new test caseOverall, the test suite is well-structured and covers the main scenarios for the validatePhone function. The use of e2e tests with the Flatfile API provides good integration testing. Good job on setting up a comprehensive test environment!
plugins/record-hook/README.md (1)
Line range hint
1-300: Summary of review findings and suggested next steps.
- The new
options.debugparameter has been well-documented in the parameters section.- There are inconsistencies between the AI-generated summary and the actual changes in the file:
- The summary mentions updates to usage examples in both JavaScript and TypeScript, but these changes are not present in the file.
- The examples have not been updated to demonstrate the usage of the new
options.debugparameter.Suggested next steps:
- Update the JavaScript and TypeScript examples to include the usage of the
options.debugparameter.- Ensure that the AI-generated summary accurately reflects the changes made in the file.
- Consider adding a brief explanation or example of how the debug logging works when enabled.
Would you like assistance in drafting the updated examples or additional explanations for the debug logging feature?
flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (1)
35-37: Consider Adding Email ValidationCurrently, the
'string'. Consider using an email validation plugin or changing the type to'email'to ensure that only valid email addresses are accepted.validate/phone/src/index.ts (4)
86-89: Improve validation for empty phone numbersThe check
if (!phone)may not catch cases wherephoneis an empty string or contains only whitespace. To ensure robust validation, consider trimming the input and checking for an empty string.Apply this diff to enhance the validation:
-if (!phone) { +if (!phone || phone.trim() === '') {
91-97: Consistent validation for country fieldSimilar to the phone number validation, ensure that the country field is not empty or contains only whitespace. This will prevent potential issues when processing the country value.
Apply this diff to improve the country field validation:
-if (!country) { +if (!country || country.trim() === '') {
104-104: Confirm the behavior of autoConvert optionWhen updating the phone number with the formatted version, you're checking if
config.autoConvertis enabled. Ensure that this aligns with the expected behavior and consider documenting the default value ofautoConvertin thePhoneFormatPluginConfiginterface.
110-112: Provide default values for concurrency and debug optionsIf
config.concurrencyandconfig.debugare undefined, it might affect the plugin's behavior. Consider assigning default values to these options to ensure consistent performance.Apply this diff to set default options:
{ - concurrency: config.concurrency, - debug: config.debug, + concurrency: config.concurrency ?? 10, + debug: config.debug ?? false, }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonvalidate/phone/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- plugins/record-hook/README.md (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/README.MD (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/rollup.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/index.e2e.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- validate/phone/rollup.config.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
validate/phone/README.MD
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
validate/phone/README.MD
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
validate/phone/src/index.e2e.spec.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM: Imports and initial setup are well-structured.The necessary dependencies are correctly imported, and the FlatfileClient is initialized outside of any test, which is a good practice for reusability across tests.
plugins/record-hook/README.md (1)
28-30: LGTM: New parameteroptions.debugis well-documented.The addition of the
options.debugparameter is clear and follows the established format for parameter documentation in this file. The description, type, default value, and purpose are all clearly stated.flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (9)
3-3: Import ofphoneFormatValidatorPluginThe import statement for
phoneFormatValidatoris correct and properly included.
7-11: Configuration ofphoneFormatValidatorThe
phoneFormatValidatorplugin is configured properly with the specified options:
phoneField:'phone'countryField:'country'autoConvert:true
7-11: Verify Matching Field Keys in Sheet ConfigurationEnsure that the fields
'phone'and'country'specified in thephoneFormatValidatorplugin match the keys defined in your sheet configuration to avoid any runtime issues.
20-21: Sheet Name and Slug UpdatedThe sheet name has been updated to
'Contacts'with the slug'contacts', which reflects the new focus on contact information.
25-27: FieldfirstNameConfigurationThe field
'firstName'is correctly defined with:
type:'string'label:'First Name'
30-32: FieldlastNameConfigurationThe field
'lastName'is correctly defined with:
type:'string'label:'Last Name'
35-37: FieldThe field
'email'is correctly defined with:
type:'string'label:'Email'
40-42: FieldphoneConfigurationThe field
'phone'is correctly defined with:
type:'string'label:'Phone'
45-47: FieldcountryConfigurationThe field
'country'is correctly defined with:
type:'string'label:'Country'validate/phone/src/index.ts (1)
99-100: Handle unexpected errors in formatPhoneNumberWhile calling
formatPhoneNumber, there might be unexpected errors due to unforeseen input values. It's a good practice to wrap external function calls in try-catch blocks to handle any exceptions and prevent the application from crashing.Consider adding a try-catch block:
const { formattedPhone, error } = formatPhoneNumber(phone, country) +if (error) { + record.addError(config.phoneField, error) +} else if (formattedPhone !== phone && config.autoConvert) { + record.set(config.phoneField, formattedPhone) +}If using
libphonenumber-js, ensure that exceptions thrown are appropriately handled.
carlbrugger
force-pushed
the
feat/PhoneValidator
branch
from
a0ea0e7 to
06cba17
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (2)
3-11: LGTM! Consider documenting theautoConvertoption.The import and configuration of the
phoneFormatValidatorplugin look good. The plugin is correctly set up to validate the 'phone' field using the 'country' field for context.Consider adding a comment explaining the implications of setting
autoConvert: true. This option might automatically modify phone numbers, which could be important for users to understand.
35-38: LGTM! Consider adding email validation.The addition of an email field is appropriate for contact information.
While using 'string' type for email is common, consider adding email validation to ensure data integrity. You could use a regex pattern or a dedicated email validation plugin if available.
Example implementation:
{ key: 'email', type: 'string', label: 'Email', constraints: [ { type: 'regex', pattern: '^[\\w-\\.]+@([\\w-]+\\.)+[\\w-]{2,4}$', error: 'Invalid email format' } ] }validate/phone/README.MD (1)
15-33: Adjust heading levels for better document structureThe parameters section uses
h4headings (####) for individual parameters, which is inconsistent with the document structure. Consider usingh3headings (###) for better hierarchy.Please apply the following changes to all parameter headings:
-#### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: **` - (optional) +### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: **` - (optional)Also, consider adding a comma after "By default" in the
sheetSlugdescription for better readability:-The `sheetSlug` parameter is the slug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. +The `sheetSlug` parameter is the slug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default, it listens to commits in all sheets.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (5)
14-41: LGTM: Test suite setup is comprehensive.The test suite setup is well-structured with proper 'beforeAll', 'afterAll', and 'afterEach' hooks. The environment setup and cleanup processes are thorough.
Consider adding error handling in the 'afterAll' hook:
afterAll(async () => { - await deleteSpace(spaceId) + try { + await deleteSpace(spaceId) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to delete space:', error) + } })This ensures that any errors during cleanup are logged and don't cause the test suite to fail unexpectedly.
43-64: LGTM: Comprehensive test case for phone number validation and formatting.This test case effectively covers multiple scenarios including valid US and UK numbers, as well as an invalid number. The assertions are thorough, checking both the formatted values and the presence/absence of error messages.
Consider adding a test case for a phone number that's valid but doesn't require formatting:
await createRecords(sheetId, [ // ... existing records ... { phone: '+1 (123) 456-7890', country: 'US' }, ]) // ... in assertions ... expect(records[3].values['phone'].value).toBe('+1 (123) 456-7890') expect(records[3].values['phone'].messages[0]?.message).toBeUndefined()This would ensure that already correctly formatted numbers are not modified.
66-78: LGTM: Test case for missing country information is appropriate.This test case effectively verifies the behavior when country information is missing. The assertion correctly checks for the expected error message on the country field.
Consider also asserting that the phone field remains unchanged when country information is missing:
expect(records[0].values['phone'].value).toBe('1234567890') expect(records[0].values['phone'].messages[0]?.message).toBeUndefined()This would ensure that the phone number is not modified when the country is missing, providing a more comprehensive test.
80-94: LGTM: Test case for disabled autoConvert is well-implemented.This test case effectively verifies the behavior when autoConvert is set to false. The assertions correctly check that the phone number remains unformatted and no error messages are generated.
Consider adding an additional assertion to verify that the country field is also unchanged:
expect(records[0].values['country'].value).toBe('US') expect(records[0].values['country'].messages.length).toBe(0)This would ensure that disabling autoConvert doesn't affect other fields, providing a more comprehensive test.
1-94: Overall, excellent test coverage and structure.This test file provides comprehensive coverage for the
validatePhonefunction, including scenarios for valid formatting, invalid numbers, missing country information, and disabled auto-conversion. The test setup and teardown are well-implemented, ensuring a clean testing environment for each case.To further improve the robustness of these tests, consider adding a test case that verifies the behavior with a large number of records (e.g., 1000+). This would help ensure that the validation function performs well under load:
it('handles a large number of records efficiently', async () => { listener.use(validatePhone({ phoneField: 'phone', countryField: 'country' })) const largeDataset = Array(1000).fill().map(() => ({ phone: '1234567890', country: 'US' })) await createRecords(sheetId, largeDataset) await listener.waitFor('commit:created') const records = await getRecords(sheetId) expect(records.length).toBe(1000) expect(records.every(r => r.values['phone'].value === '(123) 456-7890')).toBe(true) })This test would help identify any potential performance issues or race conditions that might only appear with larger datasets.
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (3)
4-11: Add documentation toPhoneFormatPluginConfiginterfaceAdding JSDoc comments to the
PhoneFormatPluginConfiginterface will enhance code readability and help other developers understand the purpose of each configuration option.
13-48: Include JSDoc comments for thevalidatePhonefunctionProviding documentation for the
validatePhonefunction will improve maintainability and assist users in understanding how to utilize this plugin effectively.
17-41: Standardize error messages for clarityFor consistency and better user experience, consider standardizing the error messages.
Update the error messages:
- record.addError(config.phoneField, 'Phone number is required') + record.addError(config.phoneField, 'The phone number is required.') - record.addError( - config.countryField, - 'Country is required for phone number formatting' - ) + record.addError( + config.countryField, + 'The country is required for phone number formatting.' + )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonvalidate/phone/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- plugins/record-hook/README.md (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/README.MD (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/rollup.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- plugins/record-hook/README.md
- validate/phone/rollup.config.mjs
- validate/phone/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
validate/phone/README.MD
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
validate/phone/README.MD
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (4)
25-33: LGTM! Good separation of first and last names.The split of the 'name' field into 'firstName' and 'lastName' is a good improvement. It provides more structured data and allows for better sorting and filtering capabilities.
40-48: LGTM! Phone and country fields align with validator configuration.The addition of the 'phone' field and retention of the 'country' field align well with the
phoneFormatValidatorconfiguration we saw earlier.This setup should provide robust phone number validation and formatting based on the country context.
Line range hint
1-56: Overall LGTM! Effective transformation to contact-focused data structure.The changes in this file successfully shift the focus from location-based data to contact information. The addition of the
phoneFormatValidatorplugin and the restructuring of fields provide a robust setup for handling contact data.Key improvements:
- Split of 'name' into 'firstName' and 'lastName' for better data structure.
- Addition of 'email' and 'phone' fields for comprehensive contact information.
- Integration of phone validation using the country context.
These changes should significantly enhance the ability to collect and validate contact information effectively.
20-22: LGTM! Consider the implications ofallowAdditionalFields.The updates to the sheet name and slug accurately reflect the new focus on contact information.
The
allowAdditionalFields: truesetting allows users to add custom fields. While this provides flexibility, it might lead to inconsistent data across imports. Consider if this aligns with your data requirements.To verify the impact, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Adjust Shell Script for Correct File Type
The previous script encountered an error due to an unrecognized file type. Please use the correct file type identifier for TypeScript or use glob patterns to target
.tsand.tsxfiles.
Approval with Considerations for
allowAdditionalFieldsThe updates to the sheet name and slug accurately reflect the new focus on contact information.
allowAdditionalFields: trueis enabled inflatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts, allowing users to add custom fields without restrictions.- In
utils/extractor/src/index.ts,allowAdditionalFieldsis conditionally set based onsourceEditorEnabled, providing controlled flexibility.Ensure that enabling
allowAdditionalFieldsis consistently managed across the codebase to maintain data consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any custom field handling in the codebase rg --type typescript "allowAdditionalFields|customFields|dynamicFields" -C 5Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any custom field handling in TypeScript files using the correct type identifier rg --type ts "allowAdditionalFields|customFields|dynamicFields" -C 5Length of output: 1368
validate/phone/README.MD (3)
1-13:⚠️ Potential issueFix grammatical error in the plugin description
There's a minor grammatical error in the plugin description that needs to be corrected.
Please apply the following change:
-event, this plugin seamlessly integrates with the data processing flow. This -plugins supports phone number formatting for multiple countries (US, UK, India, +event, this plugin seamlessly integrates with the data processing flow. This +plugin supports phone number formatting for multiple countries (US, UK, India,🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
38-42:⚠️ Potential issueCorrect the package name in the installation command
The package name in the installation command doesn't match the plugin name mentioned in the description.
Please update the installation command to use the correct package name:
-npm install @flatfile/plugin-phone-format +npm install @flatfile/plugin-validate-phone
50-68:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate the example usage for consistency
The example usage section needs to be updated to reflect the correct import name and package name.
Please apply the following changes to the example:
-import phoneFormatPlugin from '@flatfile/plugin-phone-format'; +import phoneValidatePlugin from '@flatfile/plugin-validate-phone'; export default function (listener: FlatfileListener) { - listener.use(phoneFormatPlugin({ + listener.use(phoneValidatePlugin({ sheetSlug: 'my-sheet', phoneField: 'phone_number', countryField: 'country_code', autoConvert: true })); // ... rest of your Flatfile listener }These changes ensure consistency with the plugin's name and functionality throughout the documentation.
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (1)
1-13: LGTM: Imports and initial setup are correct.The necessary imports from '@flatfile/api' and '@flatfile/utils-testing' are present, and the
validatePhonefunction is correctly imported. The FlatfileClient initialization is also appropriate.
carlbrugger
force-pushed
the
feat/PhoneValidator
branch
from
06cba17 to
6d3e94e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (2 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (7)
flatfilers/sandbox/src/index.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement for validatePhone plugin.The import statement for the
validatePhoneplugin is correctly added and aligns with the changes in the workbook configuration.
7-11: Verify the autoConvert option in validatePhone plugin.The configuration of the
validatePhoneplugin looks good and aligns with the new fields added to the workbook. However, please verify if settingautoConvert: trueis the intended behavior. This option will automatically convert phone numbers to a standard format, which may or may not be desired depending on your use case.
20-22: Clarify the purpose of allowAdditionalFields option.The changes to the sheet name and slug from "People" to "Contacts" are consistent with the shift in focus to contact information. However, the addition of
allowAdditionalFields: trueneeds clarification:
- What is the purpose of allowing additional fields?
- How will these additional fields be handled in the data processing pipeline?
- Are there any potential risks or data quality concerns with this approach?
Please provide more context on why this option was added and how it aligns with the overall data validation strategy.
Line range hint
14-54: Verify if additional sheets or workbooks are needed.The overall structure of the configuration looks correct and complete for a single "Contacts" sheet within the "Sandbox" workbook. However, please verify if this meets all the requirements of your application:
- Are there any additional sheets that should be included in this workbook?
- Are there any other workbooks that need to be configured?
If this single sheet configuration is sufficient, then the structure is appropriate. If not, consider adding more sheets or workbooks as needed.
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (3)
4-11: Well-definedPhoneFormatPluginConfiginterfaceThe interface clearly defines the required and optional configuration fields, ensuring that the plugin can be configured flexibly while enforcing necessary parameters.
13-48: Effective implementation ofvalidatePhonefunctionThe
validatePhonefunction correctly utilizesrecordHookto process records. It implements proper validation checks for required fields and handles formatting and error reporting appropriately.
1-50: Overall code qualityThe code is well-structured, readable, and adheres to best practices. It should integrate smoothly within the codebase.
bangarang
force-pushed
the
feat/PhoneValidator
branch
from
6d3e94e to
bb5867b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.ts (1)
18-24: Consider removing or conditionally enabling the console.log statementWhile logging invalid phone numbers can be useful for debugging, it might pose a privacy concern in a production environment. Consider either removing the log statement or making it conditional based on the environment:
if (!isValidPhoneNumber(phone, countryCode)) { if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') { console.log(`invalid phone number: ${phone}`) } return { formattedPhone: phone, error: `Invalid phone number format for ${country}`, } }This way, you can ensure that potentially sensitive information is not logged in production.
validate/phone/README.MD (3)
18-18: Improve readability with comma additionTo enhance readability, consider adding a comma after "By default" in the description of the
sheetSlugparameter.-The `sheetSlug` parameter is the slug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. +The `sheetSlug` parameter is the slug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default, it listens to commits in all sheets.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
17-39: Ensure consistent heading levelsThe parameter headings are currently using h4 (####) level. For better document structure, consider using h3 (###) level for these headings. This will also address the Markdownlint warning about heading increment.
Example:
-#### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: **` - (optional) +### `config.sheetSlug` - `string` - `default: **` - (optional)Apply this change to all parameter headings in this section.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
55-55: Enhance readability with comma additionTo improve readability, consider adding a comma after "my-sheet" in the example description.
-This example sets up a record hook using `listener.use` to validate and format phone numbers in the "my-sheet" sheet which contains a phone number field called `phone_number` and a country field called `country_code`. +This example sets up a record hook using `listener.use` to validate and format phone numbers in the "my-sheet" sheet, which contains a phone number field called `phone_number` and a country field called `country_code`.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~55-~55: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... format phone numbers in the "my-sheet" sheet which contains a phone number field cal...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (2)
14-41: LGTM: Test suite setup is comprehensive.The test suite setup is well-structured with appropriate hooks:
beforeAll: Creates a space and workbookafterAll: Cleans up by deleting the spaceafterEach: Resets the listener and cleans up recordsThis ensures a clean testing environment for each test case.
Consider adding error handling in the
afterAllhook:afterAll(async () => { try { await deleteSpace(spaceId) } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to delete space:', error) } })This will prevent the cleanup failure from potentially affecting subsequent test runs.
106-141: LGTM: Edge cases well covered.These two test cases effectively cover important scenarios:
- Handling missing country information
- Respecting the
autoConvert: falseoptionThe assertions correctly check for the expected behavior in each case.
Consider adding a test case that combines multiple scenarios, such as:
- A record with a valid phone number
- A record with an invalid phone number
- A record with missing country information
This would ensure that the plugin handles mixed data correctly in a single batch. For example:
it('handles mixed valid, invalid, and missing country data', async () => { listener.use(validatePhone({ phoneField: 'phone', countryField: 'country' })) await createRecords(sheetId, [ { phone: '4026911111', country: 'US' }, { phone: 'invalid-phone', country: 'UK' }, { phone: '1234567890', country: '' } ]) await listener.waitFor('commit:created') const records = await getRecords(sheetId) expect(records[0].values['phone'].value).toBe('(402) 691-1111') expect(records[1].values['phone'].messages?.[0].message).toBe('Invalid phone number format for UK') expect(records[2].values['country'].messages?.[0].message).toBe('Country is required for phone number formatting') })This addition would enhance the robustness of your test suite.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonvalidate/phone/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- validate/phone/README.MD (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- validate/phone/src/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
validate/phone/README.MD
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~6-~6: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...tes with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formatting for mu...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~55-~55: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... format phone numbers in the "my-sheet" sheet which contains a phone number field cal...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
validate/phone/README.MD
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.ts (2)
1-7: Great choice using 'libphonenumber-js' for phone number handling!The use of a well-established library for phone number validation and formatting addresses the previous concerns about maintaining custom regular expressions and formatting rules. This will make the code more robust and easier to maintain.
26-28: Excellent implementation of flexible phone number formattingThe use of
parsePhoneNumberand itsformatmethod, along with the customizableformatandformatOptionsparameters, provides a robust and flexible solution for formatting phone numbers. This implementation effectively addresses the previous concerns about handling variable phone number lengths and different country formats.validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.ts (2)
1-14: LGTM: Imports and interface declaration look goodThe imports are appropriate for the plugin's functionality, and the
PhoneFormatPluginConfiginterface is well-structured with clear option definitions.
49-54: LGTM: Function return and export look goodThe return statement and the default export of the
validatePhonefunction are correctly implemented.validate/phone/README.MD (3)
41-51: LGTM: Usage section is accurate and clearThe usage section, including the installation command and import statement, has been correctly updated. It now accurately reflects the plugin name and provides clear instructions for users.
1-73: Overall, the README is well-structured and informativeThe README provides comprehensive documentation for the @flatfile/plugin-validate-phone plugin. It covers all necessary aspects including description, parameters, installation, and usage examples. The content is clear and informative.
A few minor suggestions have been made to improve readability and consistency:
- Fixing a grammatical error in the plugin description.
- Adding commas for better readability in a couple of places.
- Adjusting heading levels for parameters to ensure consistent document structure.
After implementing these minor changes, I recommend a final review to ensure all suggestions have been correctly applied.
Great job on creating this detailed and user-friendly documentation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~6-~6: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...tes with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formatting for mu...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[uncategorized] ~18-~18: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...lug of the sheet you want to listen to. By default it listens to commits in all sheets. #...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~55-~55: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... format phone numbers in the "my-sheet" sheet which contains a phone number field cal...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time(MD001, heading-increment)
6-7:⚠️ Potential issueFix grammatical error in the plugin description
There's a grammatical error in the plugin description that was previously pointed out. The singular "This" doesn't agree with the plural "plugins".
Please apply the following change:
event, this plugin seamlessly integrates with the data processing flow. This -plugins supports phone number formatting for multiple countries (US, UK, India, +plugin supports phone number formatting for multiple countries (US, UK, India,🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~6-~6: The singular determiner ‘this’ may not agree with the plural noun ‘plugins’. Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...tegrates with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formattin...(THIS_NNS)
[uncategorized] ~6-~6: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...tes with the data processing flow. This plugins supports phone number formatting for mu...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.plugin.spec.ts (2)
1-12: LGTM: Imports and initial setup are appropriate.The necessary imports from '@flatfile/api' and '@flatfile/utils-testing' are correctly included. The
validatePhonefunction is imported from the local index file. The FlatfileClient instance is properly initialized for API interactions.
1-142: Overall, excellent test coverage with minor improvements suggested.This test suite for the
validatePhoneplugin is comprehensive and well-structured. It covers:
- Basic phone number validation and formatting
- International format handling
- Missing country information scenarios
- Respecting the
autoConvertoptionThe use of Flatfile's testing utilities and the structure of before/after hooks ensure a clean testing environment.
Summary of suggestions:
- Add error handling in the
afterAllhook- Rename the duplicate test case for clarity
- Consider adding a mixed-data test case
These minor improvements will further enhance the robustness and clarity of your test suite. Great job on writing thorough tests for this plugin!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.spec.ts (4)
21-27: Consider enhancing the error message for invalid phone numbers.While this test case correctly verifies the error handling for an invalid phone number, the error message could be more informative. Instead of a generic "Invalid phone number format for US", consider providing more specific feedback about why the number is invalid (e.g., "Phone number too short for US format").
Here's a suggested improvement:
expect(result).toEqual({ formattedPhone: '1234', - error: 'Invalid phone number format for US', + error: 'Phone number too short for US format (expected 10 digits)', });This change would make the error message more helpful for users of the
formatPhoneNumberfunction.
37-43: Consider clarifying the test description for format options.While this test case effectively verifies the handling of format options, the test description could be more specific about what options are being tested. This would improve the clarity and maintainability of the test suite.
Consider updating the test description as follows:
- it('should handle format options', () => { + it('should format US number in international format with national extension', () => {This change would make it immediately clear what specific formatting is being tested.
45-51: Consider enhancing the error message for invalid country codes.While this test case correctly verifies the error handling for an invalid country code, the error message could be more informative. Instead of a generic "Error processing phone number", consider providing more specific feedback about the invalid country code.
Here's a suggested improvement:
expect(result).toEqual({ formattedPhone: '2125551234', - error: 'Error processing phone number', + error: 'Invalid country code: XX', });This change would make the error message more helpful for users of the
formatPhoneNumberfunction by explicitly stating the cause of the error.
1-52: Great test coverage, consider adding a test for phone numbers with extensions.Overall, this is a well-structured and comprehensive test suite for the
formatPhoneNumberfunction. It covers various scenarios including different country codes, format options, and error cases. The tests are clear and effective in verifying the function's behavior.To further improve the test coverage, consider adding a test case for phone numbers with extensions. This would ensure that the function correctly handles and formats extended phone numbers.
Here's a suggested additional test case:
it('should format a US phone number with extension', () => { const result = formatPhoneNumber('2125551234x555', 'US', NumberFormat.NATIONAL); expect(result).toEqual({ formattedPhone: '(212) 555-1234 ext. 555', error: null, }); });This test would verify that the function correctly formats phone numbers with extensions, adding another layer of confidence in the function's capabilities.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
validate/phone/src/validate.phone.utils.spec.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The import statements are appropriate for the test file. They import the function being tested and the necessary enum from the library.
5-11: LGTM: Well-structured test for US phone number formatting.This test case effectively verifies the correct formatting of a valid US phone number in national format. It checks both the formatted output and the absence of an error, which are crucial aspects of the function's behavior.
13-19: LGTM: Comprehensive test for UK phone number formatting.This test case effectively verifies the correct formatting of a valid UK phone number in international format. It appropriately checks both the formatted output and the absence of an error.
29-35: LGTM: Effective test for E.164 format handling.This test case successfully verifies the correct formatting of a US phone number in E.164 format. It appropriately checks both the formatted output and the absence of an error, demonstrating the function's ability to handle different number formats.
2 participants
Please explain how to summarize this PR for the Changelog:
Tell code reviewer how and what to test: