Conversation
![flatfile-nullify[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/31830338?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Nullify Code Vulnerabilities1 findings found in this pull request
You can find a list of all findings here |
|
📝 Documentation updates detected! You can review documentation updates here |
|
📝 Documentation updates detected! You can review documentation updates here |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhanced documentation and a parameter update for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant WebhookEventForwarder as webhookEventForward()
participant HTTP as fetch
Client->>WebhookEventForwarder: Call webhookEventForward(url, payload)
WebhookEventForwarder->>HTTP: Perform fetch(url, payload)
HTTP-->>WebhookEventForwarder: Return HTTP response (using response.ok)
WebhookEventForwarder-->>Client: Return result / propagate error
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward.webhook.ts (1)
13-13:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern: Potential SSRF vulnerability
This code accepts an arbitrary URL without validation, which could lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. Consider implementing URL validation or a whitelist approach to mitigate this risk.
An example implementation with whitelist validation:
- const response = await fetch(url, { + // Define allowed domains + const allowedDomains = ['api.example.com', 'webhook.site']; + const urlObj = new URL(url); + if (!allowedDomains.some(domain => urlObj.hostname === domain || urlObj.hostname.endsWith(`.${domain}`))) { + throw new Error('URL domain not allowed'); + } + const response = await fetch(url, {
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/README.md (2)
11-26: Well-structured parameters documentationThe parameters section clearly describes the required
urlparameter, which aligns with the code changes. The documentation for each parameter is helpful and complete.However, there's a minor markdown formatting issue:
-## Parameters - -#### `url` - `string` +## Parameters + +### `url` - `string`Heading levels should only increment by one at a time (from h2 to h3, not h2 to h4).
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
13-13: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4(MD001, heading-increment)
28-49: Comprehensive usage exampleThe usage section provides clear installation instructions and a practical example that demonstrates how to use the plugin.
Similar to the parameters section, there's a minor markdown formatting issue:
-#### Install +### InstallHeadings should follow proper hierarchy (h2 → h3 → h4).
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
30-30: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4(MD001, heading-increment)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.changeset/bright-ducks-turn.md(1 hunks)plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/README.md(1 hunks)plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward.webhook.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/README.md
13-13: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
30-30: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward.webhook.ts (2)
4-4: Updated parameter requirement improves API clarityChanging the
urlparameter from optional to required is a good improvement that makes the API contract clearer and prevents potential runtime errors.
21-21: Improved HTTP response status checkUsing
response.okrather than checking for a specific status code is a better practice as it handles all successful HTTP responses (200-299)..changeset/bright-ducks-turn.md (1)
1-6: LGTM: Appropriate changeset documentationThe changeset correctly documents the patch-level documentation improvement for the webhook-event-forwarder plugin.
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/README.md (1)
1-9: Clear and informative introductionThe information card provides a concise description of the plugin's purpose and event type, which helps users understand its functionality at a glance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward-webhook.e2e.spec.ts (1)
94-101: Consider addingok: falseto the error test case mock.For consistency and to better match the real behavior of the Fetch API, consider explicitly adding
ok: falseto the error test case mock response, similar to howok: truewas added to the success case.global.fetch = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ status: 500, + ok: false, headers: { get: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('application/json'), }, json: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}), })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward-webhook.e2e.spec.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Setup
🔇 Additional comments (1)
plugins/webhook-event-forwarder/src/forward-webhook.e2e.spec.ts (1)
71-78: Good addition of theokproperty to the mock response.Adding the
ok: trueproperty to the successful mock response makes it more accurately represent a real Fetch API response. This aligns with the updated implementation ofwebhookEventForwardthat now checksresponse.okfor error handling.
2 participants
Please explain how to summarize this PR for the Changelog:
This PR add documentation to the webhook-event-forwarder plugin
Tell code reviewer how and what to test: