Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pom.xml (2)
Line range hint
467-474: Profile v23 configuration is appropriate.The profile correctly sets up Vaadin 23.3.5 (LTS) with Java 11, which is the minimum required version. Consider adding a comment explaining when to use this profile for better maintainability.
Consider documenting the following in your README:
- When to use the v23 profile
- Any known limitations or considerations when using Vaadin 23
Line range hint
476-498: Profile v24 configuration is well structured.The profile correctly sets up:
- Vaadin 24.2.6 with Java 17 (minimum required version)
- Jetty 11.0.12 (appropriate for Java 17)
- Pre-release repositories for Vaadin
Consider:
- Documenting the profile usage in README
- Adding a comment explaining why pre-release repositories are needed
- Setting up CI workflows to test against both v23 and v24 profiles
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pom.xml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pom.xml (1)
90-90: LGTM! Lombok version upgrade looks good.
The upgrade to Lombok 1.18.34 is a good move as it brings Java 21 support and various improvements. The 'provided' scope is correctly maintained.
Let's verify if any Lombok annotations are used in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the specific Lombok annotations being used to ensure compatibility:
Lombok version upgrade to 1.18.34 is safe and compatible
The codebase uses basic Lombok annotations (@Getter, @Setter, @AllArgsConstructor, @requiredargsconstructor) that have remained stable and backward compatible in version 1.18.34. These annotations are core features that haven't undergone breaking changes in this version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Lombok annotations usage
rg -l "@(Data|Getter|Setter|Builder|Value|AllArgsConstructor|NoArgsConstructor|RequiredArgsConstructor|ToString|EqualsAndHashCode|Slf4j|Log)"
Length of output: 838
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check which Lombok annotations are actually used
rg "@(Data|Getter|Setter|Builder|Value|AllArgsConstructor|NoArgsConstructor|RequiredArgsConstructor|ToString|EqualsAndHashCode|Slf4j|Log)" -A 1
Length of output: 2612
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
lombokdependency to the latest version, enhancing compatibility and functionality.