Updated action.js. Removed commented out code. Added function description for the exit function.#172
Open
kibblekitty wants to merge 1 commit intoGenderMagProject:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
…tion for exit function.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
name: Pull request template for updates to action.js
about: GenderMag Recorders Assistant project
What does this implementation fix? Explain your changes.
This implementation improves action.js conformity with style guidelines. Commented out code was removed. A function description was added for the exit function.
Does this close any open issue? (Give issue id from issue tracker)
This addresses part of issue #89
Include any related logs, error, output file etc.
N/A
Did you test on Mac and Windows?
No testing was done because the addition was made to documentation.
Did you test the full GM process and verify that the code does not contribute any unexpected errors/bugs?
No testing was done because the addition was made to documentation.
Did you follow the style guidelines and verify that the code does not have any incorrect formatting?
Yes.
If possible, provide a screenshot of the functionality.
No testing was done because the addition was made to documentation.
Any other information?
Update was made to documentation. Removed commented out code and added function description for the exit function.