Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@dhalperi
Copy link
Contributor

This depends on #158

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for the commit author(s). If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.

dhalperi and others added 6 commits March 24, 2016 15:17
- Add package-info.java to two missing packages.
- Fix a compile error leftover from changing a link to a code block,
  which requires dropping HTML escaping of brackets.
This is the primary "global state" object for the evaluation of a
Pipeline using the InProcessPipelineRunner, and is responsible for
properly routing information about the state of the pipeline to
transform evaluators.

Remove the InProcessEvaluationContext from the InProcessPipelineRunner
class, and implement as a class directly. Fix associated imports.
The docs were reversed - the late trigger is only considered after the
watermark has passed the end of the window, and the early trigger only
before the watermark has passed the end of the window.
* `compose()` or `composeKeyed()` are used to start composition
* `with()` is used to add an input-transformation, a `CombineFn`
  and an output `TupleTag`.
* A non-`CombineFn` initial builder is used to ensure that every
  composition includes at least one item
* Duplicate output tags are not allowed in the same composition
This is responsible for scheduling transform evaluations and
communicating results back to the evaluation context. The executor
handle PTransforms that block arbitarily waiting for additional input.
@davorbonaci davorbonaci merged commit 972985c into GoogleCloudPlatform:master Mar 25, 2016
@dhalperi dhalperi deleted the backport-53 branch May 16, 2016 21:35
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants