Skip to content

Conversation

@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link

Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage

This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy gsutil tool to the new and improved gcloud storage command-line interface.
gcloud storage is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other gcloud components. 🚀

Automation Details

This change was generated automatically by an agent that targets users of gsutil.
The transformations applied are based on the gsutil to gcloud storage migration guide.

⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully

While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use case is unique.
It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments appropriate to your use-case before merging.
Be aware of potential differences between gsutil and gcloud storage that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed, requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command behavior can differ subtly; the gcloud storage rsync command has a different file deletion logic than gsutil rsync, which could lead to unintended file deletions.

Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and some notable differences between the two tools.

Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. If you need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with testing, please let us know.

Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.

Support and Collaboration

The GCS CLI team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as needed.

Contact: gcs-cli-hyd@google.com

We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!

#gsutil-migration

@bhandarivijay-png bhandarivijay-png requested review from a team as code owners January 6, 2026 18:33
@bhandarivijay-png
Copy link
Author

Hi @iennae, Can we get your review on this PR? Thanks!

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the samples Issues that are directly related to samples. label Jan 6, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @bhandarivijay-png, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is part of an automated effort to transition from the legacy gsutil tool to the more modern and recommended gcloud storage command-line interface. The changes update documentation and scripts to leverage gcloud storage for improved performance, unified authentication, and a consistent user experience across Google Cloud services. Reviewers are advised to thoroughly test these changes due to potential subtle behavioral differences between the two tools.

Highlights

  • Migration to gcloud storage: This pull request migrates existing gsutil commands to their gcloud storage equivalents, aligning with Google Cloud's recommendation for the modern command-line interface for Cloud Storage.
  • Documentation Updates: Various README.md files have been updated to reflect the new gcloud storage commands for tasks such as setting default object ACLs and creating storage buckets.
  • Script Modernization: A package.json script has been modified to use gcloud storage cp --recursive for uploading static assets, replacing the legacy gsutil command.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request automatically migrates gsutil commands to their gcloud storage equivalents across several documentation files and a package.json script. The automated changes are generally correct and follow the migration guide. I've suggested one improvement in run/laravel/package.json to make the file copy operation more robust by ensuring all files, including hidden ones, are copied to the storage bucket.

"dev": "vite",
"build": "vite build",
"update-static": "vite build && gsutil -m cp -r public/* gs://${ASSET_BUCKET}"
"update-static": "vite build && gcloud storage cp --recursive public/* gs://${ASSET_BUCKET}"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While public/* works, it relies on shell globbing and will not copy hidden files (dotfiles) from the public directory. A more robust approach is to specify the directory itself with a trailing slash (public/) to ensure all its contents are copied recursively, including any hidden files.

Suggested change
"update-static": "vite build && gcloud storage cp --recursive public/* gs://${ASSET_BUCKET}"
"update-static": "vite build && gcloud storage cp --recursive public/ gs://${ASSET_BUCKET}"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

samples Issues that are directly related to samples.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants