General Citation Metadata Blocks

[eaquigley]

---

Author Name: Eleni Castro (@posixeleni)
Original Redmine Issue: 3672, https://redmine.hmdc.harvard.edu/issues/3672
Original Date: 2014-03-10
Original Assignee: Kevin Condon

---

• Question: Should it be called "Discoverability"? "General?" Concerned people might think the other blocks are not indexed for search. We don't want to overwhelm the user with fields. It's not correct to say that everything is part of the citation... all these fields... citation vs. general... unclear which would be part of the citation.
  ** A: Discussed w/ Merce and Gustavo today (03/10/14) and we decided to put all "General" metadata fields together and label them as Citation block. This usage of citation is in line with DataCite's Business Model Principles for Landing Pages: http://www.datacite.org/sites/default/files/Business_Models_Principles_v1.0.pdf
• Need to review the order of the metadata blocks. Also the order within metadata blocks? May need to review this more including:
  ** Have Producer, Distributor and Data Collector in a Contributor element or display / index them separate.
  ** Need to review Controlled vocabulary list of Subjects after Beta.

[eaquigley]

---

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Gustavo Durand (@scolapasta)
Original Date: 2014-03-13T22:33:58Z

---

This is all set for now - there may still be changes coming, but we will open individual tickets for that. Feel free to test and see if it all makes sense.

(this is now driven from a tsv file - downloaded from a google Doc = so should be straightforward to modify, as needed).

[eaquigley]

---

Original Redmine Comment
Author Name: Kevin Condon (@kcondon)
Original Date: 2014-03-25T15:48:41Z

---

Tested on 3/24

Citation block contains the general fields and confirmed they were correct by comparing to tsv.

Closing ticket