Internationalization - Facet Category/Facet Label

[JayanthyChengan]

Noticed the FacetCategory and FacetLabel remains in English and not toggling with language.

So, thought of adding those terms as key=value pairs in the bundle property files and implement as below in search-include-fragment.xhtml

https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/blob/develop/src/main/webapp/search-include-fragment.xhtml#L177

<h:outputText value="#{facetCategory.friendlyName}" styleClass="facetCategoryName"/>

modify to

<h:outputText value="#{bundle[facetCategory.friendlyName]}" styleClass="facetCategoryName"/>

Example:

FacetCategory:

#search-include-fragment.xhtml bundle[facetCategory.friendlyName]
Dataverse\u0020Category=Catégorie Dataverse
Publication\u0020Date=Date de publication
Author-Name=Nom \u2014 Auteur
Subject=Sujet
Deposit\u0020Date=Date de dépôt
File\u0020Type=Type de fichier
File\u0020Tag=Libellé de fichier
Access=Accès
Keyword-Term=Mot-clé \u2014 Terme
Author\u0020Affiliation=Affiliation de l'auteur
Language=Langue
Kind\u0020of\u0020Data=Type de données
Publication\u0020Status=Statut de publication

FacetLabel:

Researcher=Chercheur
Research\u0020Project=Projet de recherche
Journal=Revue
Organizations\u0020or\u0020Institutions=Organisation ou établissement
Teaching\u0020Course=Cours
Uncategorized=Sans catégorie
Research\u0020Group=Groupe de recherche
Laboratory=Laboratoire
Agricultural\u0020Sciences=Sciences de l'agriculture
Arts\u0020and\u0020Humanities=Arts et sciences humaines
Astronomy\u0020and\u0020Astrophysics=Astronomie et astrophysique
Business\u0020and\u0020Management=Affaires et gestion
Chemistry=Chimie
Earth\u0020and\u0020Environmental\u0020Sciences=Sciences de la terre et de l'environnement
Engineering=Génie
Medicine,\u0020Health\u0020and\u0020Life\u0020Sciences=Médecine, santé et sciences de la vie
Computer\u0020and\u0020Information\u0020Science=Informatique et science de l'information
Law=Droit
Mathematical\u0020Sciences=Sciences mathématiques
Physics=Physique
Social\u0020Sciences=Sciences sociales
Other=Autre
Published=Published
Unpublished= Non publiée
Draft= Version provisoire
In\u2000Review= En révision
Deaccessioned=Retirée

@scolapasta: please advice

Thanks

[pdurbin]

@4tikhonov mentioned the need to translate facets in last week's community call: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/dataverse-community/71kuJ6TdUIg/1NtdQPEcBAAJ

I had asked him to leave a comment on #4684 but now that this issue exists, we should have the conversation here instead.

[4tikhonov]

hi @pdurbin and @JayanthyChengan, this is exactly what I have asked during Community call. We have already requested translation of SOLR schema to all languages from DataverseEU community members.

[scolapasta]

For facet categories, I would think it would be just straightforward to take what solr returns and use that as a key into a bundle file. Did that not work so straightforwardly?

For facet labels:
I think it's because these are "values" and we store in solr the values so they are searchable. (we don't translate free text fields, for example)

So not sure what is best here. we could store the "key" in solr and then translate that with the bundles? but not sure if it would be weird that some of the metadata is translated and some is not.

I think we need to decide what the behavior we want is, before we decide on how to do that.

[4tikhonov]

The biggest problem is a maintenance of all properties in all languages in bundle file and solr. We're considering possibility to turn all properties to RDF that will be checked by some tool after every Dataverse update and will show all new/not translated properties with some provenance information who is responsible for the specific language.

[JayanthyChengan]

@scolapasta
We would like to build the interface with the "facetCategory.friendlyName" and "facetLabel.name" in search-include-fragment.xhtml toggles along with the language selection.

As we implemented at https://dataverse.scholarsportal.info/ , where key=value pairs are added to bundle property files

https://github.com/scholarsportal/SP-dataverse/blob/SP_v4.8.6.1/src/main/java/Bundle_fr.properties#L1958

https://github.com/scholarsportal/SP-dataverse/blob/SP_v4.8.6.1/src/main/java/Bundle_fr.properties#L2108

[scolapasta]

@JayanthyChengan @juancorr there are two issues related to facets and internationalization, this one and #5623. I'd like to suggest we close one and have the discussion in one. (and arbitrarily chose this one, but am fine switching). Is that OK? (if we do we should connect the other PR to this one.)

That said, I have thoughts on both PRs. We had a meeting here (tech hours) where we discussed, and while I'm not yet sure what our final guidance might be, we have some thoughts.

1. We shouldn't be adding facet categories and labels to the generic bundle.properties as they are already localized in the bundles for the metadata blocks (see @juancorr 's PR to see how he handles that)
2. However, if we do that, we'll need to also be able to somehow figure out which block, since the facets are dynamic and not necessarily always from the citation block.
3. Translating the categories makes complete sense; the labels are more problematic since they represent the data. @JayanthyChengan I noticed you translated them for ones that are controlled vocabulary, but even then I'm not sure that's the best approach. You'll notice that if your on SP dataverse if you look at a dataset that is one of those values, you see that that the value is still in English. (and for searching in solr, the value is in english).
4. For the compound fields, I understand that "Autor nôm" doesn't make sense, but do we know if using a ":" would work in all languages?

Please add some discussion if we can figure out how to move forward. My suggestion is that we start with a variation of @juancorr's pr (modifying it to support facets from any metadata block) and we would get the facet categories first.

[scolapasta]

@JayanthyChengan @juancorr I went ahead and consolidated the issues - but feel free to let us know if you prefer it the other way around.

Could you please provide comments on my suggestion above?