6099 refactor index files

[sekmiller]

New Contributors

Welcome! New contributors should at least glance at CONTRIBUTING.md, especially the section on pull requests where we encourage you to reach out to other developers before you start coding. Also, please note that we measure code coverage and prefer you write unit tests. Pull requests can still be reviewed without tests or completion of the checklist outlined below. Note that we use the "closes" syntax below to trigger Github's automation to close the corresponding issue once the pull request is merged.

Thanks for your contribution to Dataverse!

Related Issues

• closes Refactoring: Have check for whether to index files use same code as version differences #6099 use common code for file version differences

Pull Request Checklist

• Unit [tests][x] completed
• Integration tests: None
• Deployment requirements,None
• Documentation NA
• Merged latest from "develop" [branch][x] and resolved conflicts

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.003%) to 19.464% when pulling 27c6e2e on 6099-refactor-index-files into 5dca95d on develop.

[pdurbin]

@sekmiller does 824a27f fix #3842?

[sekmiller]

This should have no effect on #3842. That has to do with indexing draft datasets, this #6099 specifically deals with FILE metadata indexing. (also the intent is not to index more, just index the same amount with consolidated logic.)