-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 535
GDCC/7527-fix-redetect #8835
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
sekmiller
merged 7 commits into
IQSS:develop
from
GlobalDataverseCommunityConsortium:GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
Sep 19, 2022
Merged
GDCC/7527-fix-redetect #8835
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2aaaf15
fix mimetype detection when using temp file copy #7527
qqmyers e96f85b
add test to check that java.io.File name is not used
qqmyers 0a1f84a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'IQSS/develop' into GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
qqmyers 3886aa0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'IQSS/develop' into GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
qqmyers 6de370e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'IQSS/develop' into GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
qqmyers 79e3675
Merge remote-tracking branch 'IQSS/develop' into GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
qqmyers 77eea56
Merge remote-tracking branch 'IQSS/develop' into GDCC/7527-fix-redetect
qqmyers File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
12 changes: 0 additions & 12 deletions
12
src/main/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/util/FileTypeDetection.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
42 changes: 0 additions & 42 deletions
42
src/test/java/edu/harvard/iq/dataverse/util/FileTypeDetectionTest.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a null check in the next line here? - From looking at #8821, it appears that determineFileType() may return null here, for especially unrecognizable files; and that results in a constraint violation.
Sorry for asking for this while the PR is already in QA; but would be a trivial change. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change in FileUtil.java in this PR prevents a null return, so I think we're good?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, of course, doh! Thanks!