Let LVGL control queueTimeout#623
Merged
JF002 merged 2 commits intoInfiniTimeOrg:developfrom Oct 3, 2021
Riksu9000:lvgl_queuetimeout
Merged
Let LVGL control queueTimeout#623JF002 merged 2 commits intoInfiniTimeOrg:developfrom Riksu9000:lvgl_queuetimeout
JF002 merged 2 commits intoInfiniTimeOrg:developfrom
Riksu9000:lvgl_queuetimeout
Conversation
geekbozu
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2021
Member
geekbozu
left a comment
geekbozu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Much cleaner and uses the proper FreeRTOS workflows.
Good job as always riksu9000!
Contributor
|
Tested for few minutes, tried all apps and no issues. Great work Riksu. |
Collaborator
|
LVGL integration becomes more and more clean and efficient, thanks, @Riksu9000 ! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
lv_task_handler()returns the time in ticks to the next task it needs to run.This can now be used now that DisplayApp isn't locked to a certain refresh period to refresh apps consistently. #497
Using this time as the queueTimeout is more accurate, as messages can still cause slight delays. This also makes it possible to have tasks that run even more often than the refresh period.